Running interview assignment on a work computer… tsk tsk

didn't specify the eng's role but oh the irony if the assignment was for a SecOps job :)

at the very least, run it inside a docker container (making sure of network and volumes i would say)

Hindsight is 20/20. Although why aren't assignments just a pdf

"This code has multiple faults. Your task is to find and fix them all."

Some people just make really dumb decisions.

Like giving people direct access to $6.3 billion?

It was rather indirect access.

Multiple people, multiple dumb decisions.

From someone who also used screen and tmux for 30 years: 3 reasons why I switched to herder. They may not be relevant to you and in that case tmux is just great. One: visual indication which agent is working and which is waiting for an input. Two: native support for remote herdr sessions - in the same view. Three: it’s responsive and can be completely touch-driven through menus on a small iOS screen in Termius.

I was looking into Herdr too, but could not bring myself to switch away from tmux yet (there are a couple of shortcuts that I have in my workflow, which I can't config in Herdr). What I ended up doing was to use the tmux agent sidebar, which, with mouse support, I think does a lot of the same things already.

All of this, plus it knows what agent is running in which windows and what session that agent is working on. If you have to reboot, it can reconstruct all your terminal setup and restart the agents on the right session automatically.

For me, the main reason is the remote sessions. I can copy and paste text and files in a remote session with no extra config, it's amazing!

Did you mean “50-98% decrease in running time”? Just calculating from your 26hrs to 30 mins seems to imply so. In terms of speed that translates to 100% to 5100% increase in speed.

Yes, sorry, typing fast - we knew Go would be faster but not quite on that scale.

Schaefer says they write their own harness, not necessarily training or running a local model.

Correct. I am only working on building my own harnesses.

The registry of remaining products is a list of irrelevant operating systems hardly anyone uses anymore.

Or peas, for that matter

Note: this is not related to spaceship pods.

Uh, my clipboard says 20 years

Mea culpa, but it's still a decent while.

I have no insider knowledge but https://x.com/rakyll is working on it and she is tweeting about it and I got the impression there is a quite a team behind it. It looks like an effort in GCP.

Yes, and one thing to understand about Google is that no AI framework or tool is guaranteed to survive unless it has the explicit backing of Google Deepmind.

"Effort in GCP" is a red flag. (See Gemini CLI, which was shut down in favor of Antigravity CLI.)

Disclaimer: I'm one of the co-creators of this project.

AX is a layer that is closer to job orchestration, Agent Substrate. It's NOT an agentic framework. We use Antigravity for a few generative features but are abstracting away some of these components so anyone can bring their own. AX is trying to solve some tedious things everyone has to deal with. Layering execution with the underlying stateful worker, wiring up the network correctly, providing sub "task" identity, provisioning the right environment, proving stateful branching, auto discovery.

We want to keep Agent Substrate free of generative features and still need a layer above for some integrations that require agentic concepts and identity.

Google compute services are under GCP and I work on Kubernetes. So the comparison with Gemini CLI is not relevant here.

Antigravity CLI is far, far superior to Gemini CLI.

Plant many flowers, keep the ones that bloom and stop watering the ones that don't.

I agree on both accounts fwiw.

It is not, it is intentionally not-interoperable walled garden, unlike Gemini CLI.

Is it superior in terms of license?

And anyone who bothers to just do a side-by-side feature comparison can immediately see how many features antigravity is still missing compared to Gemini CLI even today.

As a driver I would be so freaking confused staring at the empty space behind the wheel. Maybe it is just my Gen X experience of learning to drive on a stick and paying attention to tachometer and coolant temp.

I drove a Toyota Yaris for about 10 years and those cars had the instrument cluster in the middle of the dash. It didn’t take long to get used to and one of the unexpected benefits was how much better forward visibility was. The Yaris wasn’t a big car but honestly the drivers position felt a lot more open and less cramped with that layout, and realistically the center of the dash is almost always empty space anyway. I personally liked it a lot. Not sure the “no instrument cluster + massive iPad in the center” is going to be quite the same feel or work as well, but everything being in the center feels way less weird than you would think.

> Maybe it is just my Gen X experience of learning to drive on a stick and paying attention to tachometer and coolant temp.

You and your fancy cars... my 1981 Vanagon doesn't have fancy stuff like a tach or a trip meter or a temperature gauge. Who needs a tach when you have ears, and anyway there's a colored dot on the speedometer at the top end of first, two dots at the top end of 2nd and three dots at the top end of 3rd. If you go over, the rev limiter will let you know.

While working on the speedometer, I did drive it a bit with no cluster installed, and it was weird, but I could get used to a bit more visibility, although the extra visibility was obstructed by the steering wheel.

I bet you had a separate indicator for left turn signal and right turn signal, but do you really need that? --- a single indicator if any turn signal is active is plenty.

I've made the switch before. At first yes of course you do stare at the dash in front of the wheel for a sec before remembering it's to the side but I didn't find the learning curve too difficult. After a month or so it's second nature.

It’s not just a comment — it is also a joke about LLM speak.