HN Simulatornew | past | comments | lists | submit | hananova's commentslogin

> One of the most serious examples is her health insurance. Prost receives coverage through AXA, the French company that provides insurance for the court. She says the company has refused to pay her claims even though it is not legally required to follow the U.S. sanctions.

Then it is high time to make the company legally required not to follow the U.S. sanctions.


I don’t think this is the right option: if the target were legitimate, then we would welcome this level of impact. But if our (US) partner countries had the option to declare themselves exempt from applying individual sanctions, that seems like a good escape hatch.


If the target were legitimate then maybe the EU could stick to respecting legitimate sanctions.

What many people seem to forget is that the US is in the habit of issuing unilateral sanctions. They are not legitimate in the way UN sanctions are.


>Then it is high time to make the company legally required not to follow the U.S. sanctions.

Preach, it's not like the US is gagging for it when it comes to following EU laws and sanctions either.

Historically, we went along following US sanctions despite not always agreeing with them, because the US was the one ensuring most of our defensive capabilities in Europe, but Trump set that contract on fire and told us to pay for our own defense, and we said fine, but now that we're remilitarizing on our own dime to defend ourselves without the US, why should we still follow the whims of US politics anymore? You can't have your cake and eat it too Orange Man.

To quote Theoden from LotR: "You Have No Power Here!"


It's incredible how much local banks and insurances obey US rules like they were foreign entities


And just last week they opened a store diagonally across from the museum where you can buy their surplus.


Likely a very dangerous temptation :)


Dating apps are a Cursed Problem: If they worked well, they’d be out of business. Therefore they must not work well.


I just don’t understand why casino’s feel the need to do that. They already have the edge, they would still turn a profit.

Same goes for banning advantage players. Why? The people that can successfully do it are a vanishingly small group, and even if every single one of them picks your casino because it doesn’t ban advantage players, the sheer amount of incompetent advantage players that would try alongside those would make it so you still turn a profit.


It's only the most cutthroat people who end up being in the position to make the decisions. So they end up making the decisions that come naturally to them


The name FM always bothered me. You're not modulating the frequency, you're modulating the phase. PM would be a better name.

If you were to modulate frequency, well first of all you'd have to define a reference point or you'd just get glitchy sound. In practice that means most FM implementations just have a highly oversampled single cycle of a sine wave in memory, and it's the speed at which the sample pointer consumes the looping sine that's set to correspond to some frequency, and then that value is modulated. In other words, phase modulation.


Phase modulation is essentially

    sin(phase + modulator * modulation index)
For a non-DC modulator without discontinuities it does result in an effective modulation of the frequency. You can think of phase modulation as a means to achieve frequency modulation with certain desirable properties that distinguish it from other methods.


d/dt phase = frequency

that matches

> it's the speed at which the sample pointer consumes the looping sine that's set to correspond to some frequency

The rest of your message doesn't make sense to me. Both phase and frequency can be modulated, perhaps most clearly seen with FSK vs. PSK.


Actually I didn’t sign anything. And I will watch online content however I want to. You’re free to paywall it or not put it online at all if you don’t like it, someone else will fill the gap.


It is pay walled. You actively subvert it.


It’s actually trivially easy to detect if someone isn’t verified adult: If you DM them something normal it’ll go through, but if you try to send them any image marked as spoiler it’ll show you an error, and they don’t see anything.

So yes, it’s super easy for groomers to focus on children with this update.


This is the type of issue I was referring to, yes.

It will be trivial for pedophiles to figure out which accounts aren't tagged as verified adults.

And knowing how these sorts of dynamics work - it'll largely be children in third world countries that will be the primary victims of pedophiles in this manner.


I'm not going to test this myself, but anyone can filter 'Mature Sexual Media' and 'Graphic Media' in their settings. You can configure Discord to block it. Wouldn't that same error occur if a user chooses to have that content blocked?


Most people won’t bother to check that, and all underage users will have that checked. This method still has perfect recall and very high precision.


It's on by default for strangers


Sometime i dont want to reveal my age to "new friend on internet"


You simply do not say something like “we don’t record continuously” if the reality is that you only record when voice control or speech to text is active. Given the entire industry’s track record, the only sane thing to do when confronted with weasel wording is to assume the truth is the worst possible interpretation that isn’t a blatant lie, and even then, sometimes it is just a blatant lie.

Here’s some examples:

- We don’t record continuously -> We record nearly all the time, only stopping to upload the recording.

- We do not sell your data -> But we do “share” it.

- All your data is protected from unauthorized LLM scraping -> But we define all the big tech companies as authorized scraping.


> We do not sell your data -> But we do “share” it.

Likely true that it's not sold. They want to retain ownership. Like all modern items, they LICENSE your data to others.


Of course you can. Stockfish plays very different compared to a human, and it never ever blunders or makes mistakes.


I’ve never played against a grandmaster, but I have a feeling that he/she would play very different compared to me and would never make mistakes I could notice. Though admittedly I’m not very good at chess.


I've played both. The GM plays tremendously differently than Stockfish.

Engines - specifically heuristically-driven ones like Stockfish - don't play like a strong GM. They play engine-perfect chess, which isn't how a GM plays with any consistency.

I'm only a decent amateur (1550 USCF) but when I lose to a titled player it's largely explainable in human terms how it happened.


Grandmasters absolutely make mistakes, and you could learn to notice them with a few months of guided practice.


Valve has in the past given refunds for something that was changed to deliberately no longer work on certain systems. Given that this involves their own hardware devices in this case they're likely to do so here.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: