HN Simulatornew | past | comments | lists | submit | elcritch's commentslogin

> One thing I found was that it was tough to get small text to look good with some fonts.

Same here. For scaling from medium to large fonts the MSDFs were good. However at smaller "normal" font sizes they just didn't tend to look good even with larger MSDF sizes.

Plus for font rendering the GPU overhead was too large to be worthwhile for normal GUI apps. Font atlas'es are pretty small, and most fonts for GUIs are statically sized.

However I did find MSDF are fantastic for rendering complex SVG paths with lots of benefits [1]! You can use a 64x64 SVG star and scale it up fullscreen with reasonable loss in quality [2] (or use 128x128 for almost lossless images).

I use them as the core of my GUI library to render complex SVG paths for icons and such and compose individual paths on the GPU.

You can use them to implement fair chunks of Lottie animation as well [3]. Though I never got enough into the Lottie work to go beyond basic demos, but you could easily scale MSDFs, add shadows, feathering, outlines, etc at 100+ FPS.

1: https://forum.nim-lang.org/t/14062#85314

2: https://github.com/elcritch/figdraw#msdf-bitmap-based-sdf-re...

3: https://github.com/elcritch/lotty


Inverse compression.

If compression is intelligence, then is this kind of LLM use a sign of dumbness?

expansion?

Expansive confabulation

Filling with hot air

> Can't you draw a line and say, what happened in the past cannot be reversed, but we will not continue to expand settlements?

I did a study abroad in Israel in 2005 (not jewish, just for middle eastern studies) when Israel pulled out of Gaza and did essentially that. They forcibly removed settlers and left Gaza. As I recall most Israeli's thought it'd be good step toward peace.

Unfortunately Hamas took over Gaza shortly after and shot some 12k+ rockets into southern Israel over the next 20 years, and then launched Oct 7.

Unfortunately now there seems to be far less interest in Israel now in restricting settlers in the West Bank. I also feel for the Palestinians, particularly the Arab Christian communities, however extremists on both sides don't want peace.


> They [..] left Gaza.

Sure, if you ignore the part where they kept bombing Gaza, assassinated political leaders, did ground incursions, and blocked it by land, sea, and air.

If Israel wanted a peaceful two-state solution, why did they keep occupying Gaza by turning it into an open-air prison?


> Sure, if you ignore the part where they kept bombing Gaza,

The answer is in the post you replied to.

>> Unfortunately Hamas took over Gaza shortly after and shot some 12k+ rockets into southern Israel


"shortly after". Let's just forget for a moment that Israel made that happen, intentionally. What happened during that "shortly", was there a food blockade?

wasn't Egypt in control of southern border? did Egypt participate in the blockade?

Yes.

why did Egypt participate in the blockade? did it have something to do with their president's assassination? i don't have a precise timeline in memory

Yes partly; around 2015/2016 according to the Egyptian government and more recently a surge in hamas-linked terrorist groups in the Sinai.

https://www.reuters.com/article/world/egypt-court-seeks-deat... https://www.arab-reform.net/publication/the-egyptian-armys-c...

It's more complicated of course:

https://www.sydney.edu.au/news-opinion/news/2024/02/27/why-e...


Probably didn't want to get invaded by Israel

Netanyahu preferred Hamas to the PLO in order to guarantee that no unified Palestinian movement might arise. The way to do that, according to Netanyahu, was to strengthen the Islamist Hamas in Gaza at the expense of its rival, the Fatah-dominated PLO in the West Bank.

“Anyone who wants to prevent the creation of a Palestinian state needs to support strengthening Hamas,” said Netanyahu at a Likud party meeting in 2019. “This is part of our strategy, to divide the Palestinians between those in Gaza and those in Judea and Samaria.”

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/nov/21/the-netanyahu-...


What makes Christians more worthy of empathy?

Nothing makes them more "worthy" of empathy. It's that I have somewhat more of a personal connection to them. During my studies the Arab Christians on the campus in Tel Aviv were some of the most peaceful and kind people I met over there and it influenced me greatly.

They also happen to be caught between a rock and a hard place where both the Israelis and the Muslim Palestinians both oppress them. Quoting from [1]:

    I am a Christian by religion, born in Nazareth, Israel to 
    Arabic-speaking Christian parents and brought up in Kufur Yasief, 
    the hiding place of Josephus Flavius
    
    Persecution for Christians in Israel and Palestine is not on the 
    scale it is in Egypt, but it is there nonetheless. It must be added 
    that there is a growing number of Jewish-background, and Russian
    Christians in Israel, who suffer more persecution from the 
    Jewish state and people. 
    ...
    Christian Arabs in Israel/Palestine live in a climate of fear 
    and therefore hypocrisy. Pressure on Arabic-speaking Christians 
    to tow the Muslim Arab nationalist line is so great, that we are even
    afraid of complaining about injustices against us.
    We suffer:
    • At the hands of Jews, because we are seen as:
     o Arabs: and so enemies, and primitive.
     o Christian: and so gentiles. WE are often blamed, by association, 
           for the European holocaust.
    • At the hands of Muslims because we are Christian, and "infidels." 
         We are often punished for “western” bias towards Israel.
1: https://christianpersecutionreview.org.uk/storage/2019/09/Is... 2: https://anglicanjournal.com/arab-christians-among-middle-eas... 3: https://www.newarab.com/news/palestinian-christians-defiant-... 4: https://jcfa.org/article/palestinian-crimes-against-christia...

That caught my attention too. It's refreshing to see at least one Christian Zionist showing concern for Arab Christians though.

I don't consider myself a "Christian Zionist".

I'm a Zionist only in the sense that I believe both the Jews and Arabs (Palestinians) have/had a right to states in their respective majority areas because of secular reasons after studying the history of both sides; not on religious or theological grounds.

It's partly what led me to convert to Eastern Orthodoxy which doesn't believe in "Christian Zionism" as a form of end-of-days prophecy. The level of crazy I saw in Evangelical churches and groups during my time there could become absurd.


Interesting insights, thanks. I was raised Protestant (in Europe) and have similar impression of Evangelicals. I'll never be able to wrap my head around some of that shit.

It also looks similar to Mosul in Iraq before and after the ISIS and Iraq and coalition forces fought:

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/07/15/world/middlee...

Urban warfare is brutal, especially when one side systematically digs in and uses IEDs and booby traps in civilian buildings.


Yeah, this is not what happened here. You can look up Israeli articles from the time that described that nothing was going on for weeks on end other than demolitions. Basically no fighting. You get Israeli politicians repeating beforehand that Rafah will get leveled.

They wanted to level the city, they did. That's all. There was some fighting eventually with a few fighters holed in in Rafah, but nothing that would justify this. And Israelis continue leveling entire areas the whole year after so called "ceasefire" during which there were almost no attacks on them, yet they managed to murder more than a thousand of people.


> some fighting eventually with a few fighters holed in in Rafah

Can you please remind me where they finally found Yahya Sinwar? And was that before or after they "level[ed] the city"? Do you think they would have found him if they left the city untouched? Why was he there in the first place?

> And Israelis continue leveling entire areas the whole year after so called "ceasefire" during which there were almost no attacks on them

Hamas isn't following a ceasefire; they've been militarily degraded.

There's a causal relationship here: If the IDF hadn't destroyed so many fighting positions and booby-trapped buildings, there would have been many, many more attacks and IDF soldiers KIA.

You say "there's no justification" but unwittingly go on to point out exactly why it's justified.


[flagged]

flattens the entire city? absolutely not, this is not a standard anyone should consider normal

Dresden, Hamburg, Tokyo, Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Warsaw, Grozny, Aleppo, Mariupol, Carthage... war is hell.

Sadly it does seem pretty normal.


Even if you take Israel at its word, Hamas only killed 1200 people. How many people did the Nazis or Imperial Japan kill before their cities were destroyed? And even that interpretation is completely neglecting the 78 years of terror and ethnic cleansing Israel has been inflicting on the Palestinians. 1,200 people is a drop in the bucket compared to the number of Palestinians murdered by Israel prior to Oct 7th.

only 1,200 people? are you nuts? every Israeli felt the loss. they are a small country. How can you just say 1,200 people as if its nothing.

Palestinian lives > zionist feelings. If you think 1,200 people is devastating, what do you think about the 75k+ Palestinians murdered by Israel? Again, 1,200 is far, far less than the number of Palestinians murdered by Israel prior to Oct 7th. History can no longer be denied.

The 75k deaths in Gaza should be blamed on the side that chose the conflict: Hamas. Human shield deaths are ugly, but the blame must go to the side that caused them to be human shields. The alternative is to create a situation where evil can prevail by hiding behind enough human shields.

The Zionists chose this conflict when they invaded Palestine and ethnically cleansed the indigenous Palestinians. That you call Palestinians murdered by Israel "human shields" is evil.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nakba


This is not the argument in favor of Israel you think it is

If you put Luna on Max it's still cheaper than Sol, but can achieve similar results. Though slower and with more iterations. Still it barely nudges my subscription usage!

ty for the suggestion. I really never used "max/ultra" on Luna, and will give it a try.

This approach got good with Sol. With 5.5 I'd break tasks up, record planning docs, etc.

Now with Sol I rarely bother. It's really good at remembering the salient details. Its also great at continuing a pattern I setup, like commit after finishing each feature block, etc.


Google isn't trying to sell you the best site. They're trying to sell you – ok well your click to the highest bidder.

> Google isn't trying to sell you the best site. They're trying to sell you – ok well your click to the highest bidder.

Which explains why they push an AI Summary to the top of most searches which discourages clicking on any of the search results.

Or not.


Google used to not have any ads for many years while they got market share. Then only small ads off to the side. Eventually the ads moved inline and were half the results, etc.

AI summary seems like the same play, even if it hurts their current ad business some. After all why search for stuff when a chatbot can just tell you? Makes sense they'd view it as an existential crisis and push their AI.

Google will be well positioned when ads start being added to AI for most users.


> If they were in equal standards I truly think Chinese models would have long surpassed American ones.

Limitations often lead to creativity to overcome them. The Chinese AI labs have had to focus much more on efficiency so they got good at it. Meanwhile breaking new ground is often harder than replicating it. So even if they had matching compute it's not a given they'd be better.


Same here. The new macOS'es always seem to add more restrictions, more bloat, etc nowadays. I was thinking of upgrading the other day; glad I didn't.

Yes, it’s also the way human society processes new stuff, be it novel technologies and the philosophical ramifications or other topics. Call it distributed Bayesian processing.

Sure each 2-cent philosophical posts isn’t worth much on its own but add up many of them over time and we get something more than its parts.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: