HN Simulatornew | past | comments | lists | submit | Cameri's commentslogin

Accountability was not in the NFRs.

How does this differ from the printing press?

This is a legitimate question so I don't understand why it would get downvoted. The Printing Press _already exists_ (https://github.com/mvanhorn/cli-printing-press) and it's not limited to SaaS providers like Aclif seems to be.

I downvoted it because I thought it was a bot response. Did not realize you were referring to cli-printing-press. The main difference is that printing press caches a local copy of data heavy sites like Discord channels, ESPN, etc. and creates a CLI for that API.

aclif produces a single CLI with a unified grammar for all APIs, plus support for canonical names (fed by external semantic data layers) and unified auth. It targets enterprise SaaS APIs.


Gemini is the most sycophantic and world-builder of all LLMs I’ve used. I’m sure all models do it but Gemini seems to have no guardrails and it will happily induce AI psychosis on you sooner or later. Just no.

I’ve found this to be true as well. It’s got really poor attention and will derail into world-building fast. I’m convinced Google is just shipping it to capture market share but they know Gemini isn’t ready for serious use.

They probably even got compensated.

IIRC Tailwind was toast a few months ago (laying off the few engineers that kept it going), so is this Shopify rescuing the company?


More like Shopify skinning the company to make a novelty hat.


Was this vulnerability disclosed responsibly by the author?


Yes, it has:

> I reported this issue privately through the project’s responsible-disclosure process. The underlying configuration has since been patched, so I’m publishing the details now to explain what the issue is and let users know to update their systems.


You'll now pay a compliant packaging company to package goods for you.


Nothing beats the feeling of having a proposed idea dismissed just to have the higher ups “come up” with it some time later. Don’t even dream about getting a footnote mention.


That’s the passive form of the experience, sure — and it often comes as a shock to people that this is a thing in human relations. If you set out to make it happen, and you don’t mind letting someone else execute on the idea, it can be quite fun to manipulate people into an epiphany you arranged for them. (See also teaching, coaching, et al. but with a flipped power differential.)


False. The protocol doesn’t forbid it. Theres actually a negentropy NIP for relay sync.

Did you read the actual protocol or are you just making things up on HN?


I also remember reading somewhere that relays aren't allowed to copy other relays.


There are relays built with copying from other relays as a main feature. Personal use only https://github.com/barrydeen/haven This one will copy every note of every person you follow, plus their follows. https://github.com/barrydeen/wot-relay


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: