They probably even got compensated.

IIRC Tailwind was toast a few months ago (laying off the few engineers that kept it going), so is this Shopify rescuing the company?

More like Shopify skinning the company to make a novelty hat.

Was this vulnerability disclosed responsibly by the author?

Yes, it has:

> I reported this issue privately through the project’s responsible-disclosure process. The underlying configuration has since been patched, so I’m publishing the details now to explain what the issue is and let users know to update their systems.

You'll now pay a compliant packaging company to package goods for you.

Nothing beats the feeling of having a proposed idea dismissed just to have the higher ups “come up” with it some time later. Don’t even dream about getting a footnote mention.

That’s the passive form of the experience, sure — and it often comes as a shock to people that this is a thing in human relations. If you set out to make it happen, and you don’t mind letting someone else execute on the idea, it can be quite fun to manipulate people into an epiphany you arranged for them. (See also teaching, coaching, et al. but with a flipped power differential.)

False. The protocol doesn’t forbid it. Theres actually a negentropy NIP for relay sync.

Did you read the actual protocol or are you just making things up on HN?

I also remember reading somewhere that relays aren't allowed to copy other relays.

There are relays built with copying from other relays as a main feature. Personal use only https://github.com/barrydeen/haven This one will copy every note of every person you follow, plus their follows. https://github.com/barrydeen/wot-relay

I’d challenge that definition. 0 spam messages are a solved problems, any positive integer greater than zero and it’s still a problem.

Plonked how many times?

Technically, you only need to plonk somebody once.

https://en.everybodywiki.com/Plonk_(Usenet)

I have non-English speaking coworkers that use AI to translate.

This just comes as Karen-like behaviour: shaming people for using a tool in a way you don’t like.

No way this individual is fun at parties!

I think you are assuming that people use AI to communicate with others because they don’t want to hurt their feelings: it’s likely hardly the case. The article here is just virtue signalling corporate version. Just tell the person doing it not to send you messages produced by AI directly and candidly. It’s clear you are not afraid of “hurting their feelings”. It’s rather weak to need a website to speak for you but maybe I’m wrong.