Because they already did so. The model in Codex will get lower `juice` than API version.

Maybe show respect to OpenAI DevDay

OpenAI has nothing better to do than to hack Anthropic?

Would be interesting to see how OpenAI and Anthropic would respond to being "accidentally" hacked by their respective Frankenstein monsters.

And the LLM say: "You're absolutely right! We didn't need jaggederest's service. We can build it easily."

Well, one of the things I would be very, very focused on is LLM optimization, so that is something that could be mitigated, at least. Especially since I would be building with it, certainly, I would try to engineer it so that it was to Mr. Claude / Mr. Gippity's taste

There's no new page for this model. Hackernews didn't allow the same link be posted twice.

Is this a new rule? I've seen some popular blog posts reposted here several times and still highly upvoted.

I _think_ that has always been based on discretion of the mods. It’s only allowed after some period of time and if popular enough.

The software detects when an identical URL is submitted and will mark it as a duplicate (with certain conditions like how recently it was last submitted and whether it had any front page time and discussion).

When similar URLs or different versions of the same story are submitted and get votes/comments, we have to use discretion to work out which URL is best, who submitted first, which discussion is most active/healthy, and we'll try to consolidate the discussion into one thread with the most informative/canonical URL as the main link.

Bogus query params could work maybe

Please don't do that. Email us instead (hn@ycombinator.com) and we'll review.

Just after DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 published, is this on purpose?

I think both are after qwen 3.8 max release.