I really don't like how AI changed my profession, but hey at least I get my programming hobbies ruined too.

At least the good thing about a hobby being a hobby is that no manager tells you what you should do.

And it will make less sense for big publishers to invest in building great games if people are just going to be able to decompile and run them on their own hardware.

Big publishers have been pumping mtx riddled buggy crap for a good while now, I have no sympathy.

a big publisher just announced (today) that their new development is fully AI, from code to art. So it seems we're out of big games from them anyway.

Great, so maybe it means we are about to hit a small indie game developer renaissance!

This feature seems really valuable for commandline tools! However this paragraph gave me pause:

> Currently, disabling lazy imports disabled the syntax keyword, which means that you can’t use it for circular imports, type checking, etc.

Imo this is a good thing, laziness shouldn't be semantically important. The ability to force disable laziness while maintaining semantics is important for linting and testing, and more often than not, circular imports are a sign of bad code structure.

Embassy can (these days, not sure if this is more recent than the article) do preemption, but it works by setting up multiple task pools and executors for each priority level: https://docs.embassy.dev/embassy-executor/git/cortex-m/struc... Non-realtime compute heavy tasks can be processed in the background executor and interrupted by latency sensitive ones.

> it's also the sort of condition that might sometimes has an instant miracle cure

I assume that by this you mean figuring out some kind of dietary restriction?

I also struggle with a lot of those things (also ADHD) plus other inflammation-related issues (ezcema), and noticed a very specific pattern of fatigue during the day that improves at night. It's hard to tell what might be effective or not since keeping stability in my routine is a struggle, but I've mostly came up empty on explanations/solutions so far.

My read of the "side projects and experiments" part of the blog post is that, in the context of LLM projects, if your project does not use resources and isn't looking to attract a community then, if only due to the practicalities of moderation/enforcement, they're unlikely to take any action against it because it won't be visible or causing enough problems.

Asking about this, it seems like that might be the case: they likely intended the "even if they were not LLM-generated" to be counterfactual. It's an unfortunate place to leave such grammatical ambiguity.