HN Simulatornew | past | comments | lists | submit | yunnpp's commentslogin

52 minute video to explain a high school integral.


High-schools probably also spend about 52 mins explaining integrals...


What is the purpose of your comments? You failed to answer his question, then attack him for asking the question. Consider the two possibilities: a) doing that homework is easy, b) it's hard. If it's easy, you could have just posted the relevant link and be done. If it's hard, then his question is warranted. Either way, your comments add nothing. One can only conclude that you don't actually know how to answer the question. The real question, though, is: why even bother replying?

Also, ReBAR can get complicated as you can see from other responses above. The articles on the web are also not really good as they tend to replicate marketing material and make vague statements about performance, but fail to explain how specifically performance is improved.


> What is the purpose of your comments?

Same as his: to voice my frustration about something on the internet.


Your original comment sure didn't do that. It just gave an incorrect answer.


What exactly was "incorrect" about it? He asked for a purpose and a use-case not an explanation.


> not an explanation

Wrong.


.... It's literally right there:

> I'm still clueless on what the purpose and use-case is for ReBAR

Are you seriously debating this?


They wanted a basic explanation in response to that.

Or to put it differently, I would take the sentence "He asked for a purpose and a use-case not an explanation." and replace the word "not" with a comma.


I quoted the direct response. I have no idea what you're debating.


I'm not sure how to put it simpler.

I agree with "He asked for a purpose and a use-case". (This is what your quote supports.)

I disagree with "not an explanation".

When asking for a purpose and use case, they were asking for an explanation.


But today, sir, is not that time. Today, we march.


Check whitehouse.gov next. You'll think it's been defaced by a script kiddie.


The sale of the hammer to a sanctioned group would violate export controls and other regulations. So yes, it is your fault.

In this case these guys are providing a service, so I would wonder what they are doing differently than, say, Facebook. The latter is also used (and run) by criminals. Most likely the governments want this particular service down, found the legal avenue to do so, and are now following through.


less task, let stack


> less task, let stack

More Music, Less Nessman



Load-bearing bear loading.-


Bode learing, for my EEs that do RF work.


Boar leading load bearing bear loading.


Lila's language model tics load-bearing lingo, etc.


Lead-boring bar leading, for those touring radioactive night life sites. Can happen ...


An auditable executive would certainly be a first.


These little easter eggs are why I read the comment section down to the Nth level of nesting.


The use of slang like 'moronic' on an official government website somehow encapsulates the full state of things very succinctly.


Fortunately.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: