What happened of the deposits btw ??

Some like Sam Altman cancelled it. So seems cancellable at least. But yeah, free loan.

I've seen the exact same in my reviews of some PRs on my team. The one with the static array and tests of presence/absence in this array is often appearing for some reason.

The most insulting: I once commented on the review that the test wasn't testing anything, an my colleague promptly launched his skill on my review and let claude remove the test. He didn't even read my comment.

Our hierarchy pushes for unrestricted AI use; now I just stop reading and refuse to review that kind of shit.

How can you claim that this is an experiment when you deploy it everywhere all at once, and have semi-autonomous, paying versions of it (Muse, https://dev.meta.ai/) in the hands of 1000s of people?

I like that metaphor, because it translates well into software:

- You have a problem.

- Someone takes the time to fix that problem for $10k worth of coding time.

- Now they sell 1000s of clients the same software for $99, with 0s of work.

What's is the difference with your case?

One comment on the auto language translation: the french version is comically bad :)

I'd rather read it in english where the wording is (kinda, Claude is visible) more on point.

oui

I'm trying to understand why the C suite is reaching for AI. I mean, what is driving them to force people to use it so much ?

Is it fear of the business being copied elsewhere?

Is it because monetary incentives to lessen the workforce?

Is it just all rich people's clubs laundering the same idea that AI will solve their problems, and the Cxx come back from their retreats and make it their stance that all company should use AI because muy buddy at the golf course said it?

Is it the promise of x10 the productivity?

My company has been holding on raises for a few years, but it's open bar on AI usage. And I feel it in the reviews: some are expedited without even a human in the loop. It also outs people that have no care for the result, they push things they don't even understand. The C suite has words like "every developer pushing a MR should be able to explain why and how", and in the same week, push for full automation of the Spec -> Implementation -> MR -> Review flow.

I don't quite understand the endgame here.

Neither do I. And we are not even at the 10x they so eagarly wanting. Nearly 3x and that's assuming every new MR matters.

I think its a combination of phycosis, detachment from the codebase, and weak critical thinking

Did you just use metaphor to show insight of the subject instead of exposing the real mechanism?

What would be the reason for the model to respond this? Can you explain for us plebs that don't have intimate knowledge of LLM internal architecture?

Show us recent rulings in the federal level in the US in favor of people/consumers and ill bail.

AI is capable of generating things that are nearly indiscernible from reality, with almost any input, be it adversarial or other. Photoshop at least involved some manual trimming and lengthy process that couldn't be applied to "literally anything you can thing of".

See these:

- https://www.instagram.com/p/DTDKbhflVRO/ - https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ckg8wvz427vo#:~:text=Accor...

And many, many examples in day to day reporting.

I'd rather have the laywork already there to punish sensationalist publishers that abuse AI to forge alternate realities than nothing.

Manipulating information is going to be the plague of the post-GPT/post-Midjourney era. We are entering an era where trust if going to be hard earned, and I don't know how you can trust for-profit or politician/billionaire owned companies anymore. What prevents WaPo from manufacturing information?