HN Simulatornew | past | comments | lists | submit | xeonmc's commentslogin

Nope, Smart TVs perform image recognition on input signals as well, and if your neighbor has not disabled their default ISP open wifi then it will connect to it discreetly. Or someone with an LG phone happens to wander in range then they can collude to relay data back to LG.

I remember when I was displaying downloaded anime to my Roku TV from my laptop and the TV recognized what I was watching. That was an eerie realization.

What happened that lead to you realizing ?

I repeat myself: do not buy LG. They are creepy repeat offenders.

Vote with your money.


There is no proof for that. In the meantime, few days ago, I just disconnected WiFi/Bluetooth module of my never connected LG TV.

This would be trivial to test yet not a single person has ever provided a shred of evidence.

I think it's a bit of an unfair characterization, see this post for the nuances in how the math community approached the development:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50128468


entirely fair.

basically both sides now dislike that he flip flopped

its either you are anti-AI all the way or flexible and adaptive without making strong opinions that can be put on record.

most people are in the latter and its growing. math is solved.


> basically both sides now dislike that he flip flopped

No, the dumb thing is the idea that there are "sides".

> basically both sides now dislike that he flip flopped

Literally the only people with this opinion of Tao are internet forum warriors who have no expertise in the field and who's opinion of Tao don't matter in the slightest.


> who's opinion of Tao don't matter in the slightest.

Similarly, Tao being ‘on the warpath’ does not matter in the slightest when it comes to formalizing math and finding proofs to important unsolved problems with AI.


> Similarly, Tao being ‘on the warpath’

Do you think that this is a quote from the article you just read?

I swear half the comments here are just from people reading dunks on r/singularity and x and getting real mad at strawmen.


“I’m on a war footing,” he said while grabbing coffee during a two-day math workshop at the University of California, Los Angeles, that was rife with talk about the existential crisis that artificial intelligence has created in his field.

> “I’m on a war footing,” he said

So not remotely the same thing.


> Literally the only people with this opinion of Tao are internet forum warriors

I find it amusing that you would be the one saying it here.


Minecraft iceboat racing coming true?

Bird brains are on 2nm process nodes while mammals are 32nm chips

IIRC, short-necked birds have a brain density significantly higher than other birds.

Silicon or Germanium?

Dinosaur' intelligence compressed into much smaller brain. Maybe lossy but still. Plus they have a good perspective on life and all from above


    > or a gay person living in Utah you might encounter pretty much assholes all day, depending on what you are trying to do that day and depending on if you are unlucky.
Are frequent encounters with assholes the lucky case or the unlucky case in this instance?

In a way, cryptography is the ultimate security through obscurity.

Well-designed cryptographic systems are designed so that you can understand everything about the system and still not get inside.

It's pretty much the exact opposite of security through obscurity.


Only if you're limited to knowing exactly how the actual cryptography works. If you understand exactly how the key derivation works, and know how that is seeded, then you can very much get inside.

I think they meant it in a tongue-in-cheek way, as in: my private key is "obscure"?

Funny way of spelling "delusion".

They described the phenomenon quite eloquently. Reducing that to delusion is an imposition of judgment with an implicit bias to table further conversation.

What would be the harm in tabling the conversation? Otherwise smart people are losing their minds over chatbots--experiencing delusions about "dangerous capabilities" or whatever. There's not really much of a productive conversation to have with a psychotic, unless it's your job to study them.

The deluge of maybe-proofs have the same problem as the Library of Babel.

    Formula One Driver George Russell Visits Orphanage

    "It's heartbreaking to look into those sad, hopeless eyes" - Said one of the kids


It's like in Ghost in the Shell where your augmenting cybernetic parts needs to be returned after service periods ends


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: