Not only is it a serious proposal, it's been used in practice in every airport X-ray baggage scanner for decades, where it's called Threat Image Projection (TIP): https://www.xscann.com/products-HiTipPlus.html and it's actually a regulatory requirement in that context in a number of countries: https://caainternational.com/course/threat-image-projection-...

Yes, but you can require it in such a situation, as they're subordinates who have to follow policy or lose their jobs.

As I pointed out above, Anthropic places a lot of requirements on its users already, but if Claude Code TIP were optional, presumably, savvy users would turn it on voluntarily, unless they wanted to use Auto Mode. As Anthropic's study clearly documents, the current manual approval workflow basically doesn't work at all, because the users just approve 87% of dangerous actions. So there's no reason to use it, except maybe very rarely.

Most of anthropic's money comes from enterprises that may want to enforce something like this at an org level.

The same scanners that let handguns et al through 93% of the time, according to internal audits and journalist review?

Maybe pick a better comparison if so?

Enterprises do the exact same thing today by sending phishing emails to their own people to figure out who needs additional training. Why would an enterprise not want this feature for Claude? It seems like an extremely serious proposal.

Knowing them they'll have all this stuff online just as the AI bubble pops. Basically the same thing they did when they belatedly tried to get into mobile chips

IMO most modern engineering practices are cargo culture. I’m sure in 10 years we look back on today the same way we’d look back on the days before version control was common. We are in the emailing files around stage of development

It’s not riskless, it’s just the benchmark that all active investors and their associated podcasters have to beat.

Active investors usually fall into the same fallacy where people all rate themselves as above average. Mathematically speaking a large portion of active investors have to do worse than average and simply stating FUD about averages won’t change that

ah yes, instead of giving students homework, have them serve in the military for a few years until they’re ready for college

Sure, why not? That's not the best option for everyone but worked out well for several people I know.

nothing like some killing to get you settled down.

Oh come on, how is that related at all?

You don't think overfunding a gigantic army has any connection with said army committing war crimes all over the world?

Interesting username considering Worf served in the two largest armies of Humans and Klingons. Not all large armies are meant for destroying everything in the world.

Maybe OP can explain why with unlimited tokens neither OAI nor Anthropic have any first party apps other than the main Claude/chatgpt apps

There are only so many rust migrations you can do, at some point you gotta ship something user visible which means you have to deal with people which means the code was never the bottleneck even in 2014

> If a ghost is close (nearest_ghost_distance small, " "within 2 steps), choose flee_ghost. Otherwise choose " "chase_dot to eat the nearest dot."

Dude, this is AI psychosis. Just ask the LLM to write you a program (“compile”) and then you can run it locally forever

They’re not fundamentally different at all. In fact the paper is using existing models as a backbone and just providing a shortcut between the two ends of the pipeline

Pass the blunt my guy