Sure is. My best guess, assuming it's not a bug, is that someone somehow managed to get an offensive-looking Identicon and complained loud enough so they removed them.
In any case, I really hope they return. There is the username, of course, but it is a nice touch to have a mostly unique simplistic avatar for those who don't supply their own profile picture.
---
Update: It looks like the Identicons might be back.
How many jumbles did it take? And, given that they're random and the user can choose another, what liability is there there for not censoring randomly-generated Identicons?
Should we all stop using ASCII fingerprints for keys because it could accidentally say e.g. 6 6 6 / 212 = 3.1415?
To sandbox LSP servers in sphinxdocrs with bwrap in rootless containers, we needed to add a --no-procfs-mount CLI arg (and MXC JSON) to sandboxes, because you can't mount /proc in a rootless container.
Can Beta-Cyclodextrin treat (calcified) atherosclerotic plaques? And gout?
> What percentage of cardiovascular "plaque" is sugar alcohol and thus apparently treatable with β or α cyclodextrin, in controls and patients with conditions like Arteriosclerosis and Atherosclerosis?
Q: Do the iServices like iCloud, App Store, etc work?
A: No, at least not yet. They possibly require something iOS refers to as the “Legacy FairPlay Key Descrambler” AES (hardware) command.
> How does Cerebras WSE-3 with 44GB of 'L2' on-chip SRAM compare to Google's TPUs, Tesla's TPUs, NorthPole, Groq LPU, Tenstorrent's, and AMD's NPU designs?
There are TPUs made out of silicon carbide with standard fab.
There is in-flight tensor processing with photons, but that's not quite a TPU.
I have some work in Lean4 that I'm certainly unqualified to validate; Layer Coding QEC derivation, Positive Grassmanians and the Fresnel-Kerchhoff correction to the Parallel-Axis theorem, Huygens intensity as an alternate model for simulating photonic and electronic interference in a double slit experiment, for example.
It was a black box but I'm letting it tutor me about it so
Visual proofs, Tools for logic and formal methods in distributed systems
Things that compile logic!
> That means you can end up with systems you've built where you don't truly understand how all the code works
Though AI coding and system development can be overwhelming due to information overload and rapid growth in complexity (and concern for unwittingly embedded mistakes, the unsecurability of agent-based development, and number of LOC of code per day), not understanding the whole system sufficiently is normal and expected in engineering.
One weekend, on a branch that isn't merged, I built a rudimentary SDL-based simulator for (InkHUD) ePaper GUI development that works on x86 without ESP32 emulation because Meshtastic compiles for x86, too. https://github.com/westurner/firmware/commits/add_weather_ht...
The SPI display driver that records screencasts to MAV (Mu Animation Video) format - just like a fax - might be useful.
In another project, teact.sim, I've developed another similarly limited simulator for eZ80 and Python but we don't need to emulate the ARM processor because Python works on x86. So we emulate the ez80 in plain Python; and someday that might compile to WASM with Pyodide.
IIRC there's Qemu in WASM. Would ESP32 work in Qemu in WASM? Is this faster?
reply