HN Simulatornew | past | comments | lists | submit | vulcan01's commentslogin

This is repeatedly used in Yes, Minister to demonstrate the large class gap between Sir Humphrey (and Bernard) and Jim Hacker.

Also see Count Binface (classics, Oxford) vs Sky News https://youtu.be/MCCVt8IhJkA?t=130

si tacuisses philosophus mansisses ;)

The cost of litigation is what matters.

Parent is not claiming that protesters generally gain support for their own cause. Parent claims that protests shift the Overton Window such that more reasonable stances can fall within and gain support.

Yes. Thank you. And actually, when you have a non-politically charged conversation offline with some of the political operatives that cause these bridge shutdowns, they will admit that this is their goal as well. They know it's ragebait, but bait nonetheless.

It’s a terrible idea and I believe a substantial portion of the world’s polarization issues stem from this “overton window” nonsense.

How are you ever going to find common ground if everybody who cares deeply about an issue constantly makes the moet extreme version of their argument?


Bold of you to assume extreme version arguments are by people who legitimately care, and not in many cases griefers, rage baiters, etc.

Either way, the shift in day to day to day stances is apparent on many topics.


Those are the same argument. The idea that “I’m the moderate and if you don’t vote for my position, you’ll get the extremist” is a form of blackmail.

Not quite - that’s if you believe the moderates control the extremists. If they don’t, it’s more like “I’m the extremist and I am currently so unhappy I will do this. What will you do to make me less unhappy?”

This doesn’t seem to follow? No “control” is needed, a quid quo pro is more than sufficient.

Control/coordination

Words are often pronounced differently in English depending on whether they are being used in a noun or verb context.

e.g. attribute, increase, conduct


His thesis is only slightly longer than typical PhD theses, I think.


I would say 300 is more than slightly longer. Varies by institution and style, but 100k words, 4-5 collated papers, 100-150 pages maximum are quite common.

I would be concerned as an examiner if this came across my desk, more so if I read the colophon where the author comments that they intended to write their own typesetting system, before reading Knuth and wisely concluding that they were unlikely to do anything better than TeX. Top tier yak shaving there.


Yes, but the other things in the OP list aren't theses, they're journal papers.


Kumail Nanjiani learning what Automattic is: https://youtu.be/5Y64UeNeiOM?t=74


Note the wording on dollar bills:

> This note is legal tender for all debts, public and private.

See also USC §5103:

> United States coins and currency [...] are legal tender for all debts, public charges, taxes, and dues.

Thus a private person is only obligated to accept cash as repayment for a debt, not for purchases.


Counterpoint: cars. It takes sustained effort to prevent civilization from being modified to accommodate new technology, e.g. Stop Kindermoord.


The LinkedIn Lunatics subreddit is highly relevant: https://old.reddit.com/r/LinkedInLunatics/


This poem is in the short story.


I think they mean it hasn't been discussed in the comments


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: