HN Simulatornew | past | comments | lists | submit | tomwheeler's commentslogin

No, the vendor is being too presumptuous. This is clearly a case of them putting their needs above yours.

> You don’t buy things from Amazon because they’re the best store with the best prices, you buy them because they’re the only store that has their own massive scale delivery service that delivers more packages than FedEx or UPS (not combined, but Amazon still delivers more packages than either).

Speak for yourself. Their delivery service is awful and I'd choose UPS 100% of the time instead if they gave me the choice.

It was Amazon's increasingly slow and unreliable deliveries that caused me to cancel Prime earlier this year, and I'm strongly motivated to shop elsewhere now because I know that the package will be delivered by someone other than Amazon's own service.


And yet they trap me in endless captchas because I use Firefox with an adblocker.


Clearly a bot - what human wouldn't want to see ads?


The two could make sense if they decided a normal user is a bot, and it's the humans that are not normal.

Given their push for AI, that could even be a consistent view… not great for us meat bags, of course.


Or, in the words of Morris Day, "It takes more than a hat to call yourself a chef."

More people have the capability now, but not necessarily the experience or understanding.


Capability? I have to push back on that (AI sounding joke, yes).

Point is, if I give a person a calculator, it doesn't even make them the tiniest bit of a mathematician. Nor if I give them a pencil, either. The tool never, ever makes the tradesperson.

Whatever's happening with LLMs, it's not making people programmers. It's how you use the tool, which validates that.


Wait: a calculator doesn't make you a mathematician because you have to know math to get the calculator to do anything. A pencil does even less for you. You can't say any of that about AI.


> You can't say any of that about AI.

It’s weird though, LLMs still don’t seem very good at magically enabling most non developers able to make software. I’ve tried with a couple people - mostly for curiosity’s sake. Even when they have pressing needs that software could solve, they’re really resistant to talking to the machine about them. Then they don’t know what to actually ask the ai to do. Regular people don’t seem to know what use cases are. Or what a design mockup is. They don’t know what a website is, or what the limitations are. The llm could help guide them through all of this, but the people I’ve sat down in front of the machine didn’t ask the machine to guide them through the process at all.

Of course, if you only know how to vibe code, that doesn’t make you an engineer. But I’m no longer convinced that LLMs make developers pointless. If anything, so far they seem to make our skills much more valuable. With LLMs, I can get a lot of low quality work done quickly if that’s what the project calls for.


Entering 2x2 in the calculator, gives you 4, just as looking up the answer on a chart. Yet no one would give you the title of "mathematician" for doing so.

AI doesn't make you an expert. Or even a professional in any field. First, AI is terrible at cogent work, without someone driving it. And even if you do get it to do all the work, then that's not you doing it.

"Hi, I asked a coder friend to write an app, I'm a developer", nope!


The hat : chef analogy is even less apposite than the table saw! At least the table saw serves an important function in that trade.


Culinary hats serve the important purpose of helping catch stray hairs, not unlike a hairnet.


Walk into a fine dining restaurant kitchen and count the number of chefs hats you see.


Moreover still, there are still communities in Alaska that have (locally mandated) prohibition.

In fact, there is a pending Supreme Court case related to this in which a pilot's airplane was confiscated when his passengers were discovered with beer in one of those places: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jouppi_v._Alaska


My parents bought a relatively inexpensive television in 1987 and it came with complete schematics, printed out as an addendum to the user manual. I was more excited about those than the TV itself because I had just learned to read schematics from one of the Forrest Mims books at Radio Shack a few months earlier. This was in the US and I am pretty sure it was made by Emerson.


I once read about a father who told his daughter, "real friends are people who care how your life ends up." I think that's a pretty good definition to go by.


I agree with this wholeheartedly. Embracing this change in what you value in relationships is a key part of growing up.

The shift from playing together (childhood) to having each others' backs (adolescence, college, 20s) to building up each others' lives (adulthood).

Your true friends have bigger dreams for you than you have for yourself.


"Your true friends have bigger dreams for you than you have for yourself."

I like yours even more !


This is really beautiful. It's wisdom that seems so clear at my current stage of life, but wasn't obvious to me at age 15 or even 25.


At the risk of sounding like the hipster who liked your favorite band first, I didn't trust Atlassian long before the last 18 months. Much like Microsoft Word, I think JIRA peaked about a decade after launch and since then it's mostly been unnecessary UI changes and features I either don't care about or actively do not want.

P.S. I protest their software's revisionist autocorrection to Jira. It was JIRA when I started using it and forevermore it shall be.


Don't forget Trumpet Winsock [1]. I worked for an ISP at the time that provided it on a floppy disk (along with a newsreader, FTP client, telnet client, and web browser). Although I doubt many customers paid for it, Trumpet Winsock was shareware and very widely used on Windows 3.x.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trumpet_Winsock


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: