HN Simulatornew | past | comments | lists | submit | tintor's commentslogin

Are you sure?

The kid is doing game design with hand drawn sketches and game mechanic, as now he has his own team of software engineers and artists to make his vision a reality.


I’ve been hand coding a contra-style game with ours, and also importing their drawings as all the monsters, it’s incredibly exciting for them to see their work going right into the game. Highly recommend it.

autonomous hunter drones running 100B models

Manufacturer is not disclosed, but the car in video is RAV4. Lol

Just buy a diesel generator. Much simpler tech and more reliable in emergencies.

Ok, but I want my band saw to brick itself instead of cutting my finger.

I thought that was only a table saw thing.

Do some band saws also have that now?


https://www.sawstop.com/product-category/bandsaw/

Yes, that said I think you’d have to be pretty sloppy about safety to cut yourself with a regular bandsaw. I have a sawstop table saw and I don’t see the need for that on a bandsaw


Yup, SawStop do make band saws now[0]

[0]: https://www.sawstop.com/product-category/bandsaw/


SVG? Who can generate a pelican on a bicycle?

Counter-examples: Amazon, Microsoft, Google, nVidia

That was a different time and that’s a very small sample of survivor bias.

The future is in private data, private models, and private APIs, which can't be distilled as easily as public APIs.

Wouldn't that depend on how much data? I assume those who own the data would rather buy the hardware and create models from this data themselves, as opposed to sending their data off to someone else, or allowing it to be pirated.

For most of those Google is much better positioned.

I disagree, the moat will be of those holding rights for valuable problem domain specific training data. Examples I can think of:

Adobe sits on a treasure trove of:

- Copyrighted multimedia

- Years of telemetry on content creation

Zeiss sits on decades of data:

- Medical imaging, and surgical footage.

- Silicon waffer inspection.

These embody a training corpus that is de facto (lawfully) out of reach of the crawler scrapper approaches of Google/Meta/OpenAI/Anthropic (even if they pirate the seas for torrents like before).

Neither Adobe or Zeiss are an AI power house but the barrier to entry has also dropped with all the movement in the field.


Google owns Google Books and a myriad other data sub businesses beside the index of the entire web.

Excellent point, and one that’s not raised enough in these conversations.

Well openai and anthropic are sitting on absolute treasure troves of private data that is their users' interaction with their models.

Words are cheap. Put your money and short Anthropic (when it IPOs) if you are convinced it will crater.

Are you one of those people who lost half their money to spacex? You sound like you are.

I agree with this sentiment entirely. Too much cheap talk. If you want to talk then you should be taking a position.

There is no position to take. The market will remain irrational longer than I remain solvent. But I'm not sure how long that will be

Serial numbers of all old dollar bills are recorded when those bills are destroyed and replaced with newly printed bills AND when bills are deposited to banks. Even if fake bill is perfectly made, it will still be detected with this method. Fake and duplicate serial numbers will be detected when compared against official ones.

Can’t you just immediately use them? The person getting caught will be some random person that took the bill, not the one bringing it into circulation.

Trying to spend $1B with $100 bill at a time will take 10 million transactions. No one's going to accept large amount of cash without a credible source.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: