I'm completely uninterested in the opinion of a video game journalist on what does and doesn't work well in writing software. The author knows about as much about writing code as he knows about performing heart surgery
Ars Technica in general has also been catering to their knee-jerk anti-AI audience. I used to find their comments section somewhat interesting but now it's the same old tired, outdated dunks on AI.
"the talk of AI data centers' impact on the world" has been wildly exaggerated and you can see here that this is the least impact of any major new technology in the history of industrialization
Exaggerated or poorly represented? One candidate for governor in my state likens it to the railroad bubble. Satya Nadella makes the same comparison. What happens when the bubble pops? We're seeing data centers outbid industrial plants for sites. Plants which would provide 100x as many jobs as a data center and not be abandoned in 2028 when the chips still aren't available and contracts come due.
Oh right, just some rubes in flyover states that don't know what's good for them.
Look I wanted to like bsky but the fact is that their userbase has been doing as much rage and culture wars and engagement bait as any other. I mean look at what just happened the other day with the paint.net guy
It seems the paint.net situation was more about anti-AI folks vs a pro AI dev. Not very red or blue coded, nor engagement bait, as far as I can tell. I suppose it is something of a culture war. Albeit without the CEO's thumb on the scales.
Good point, re: the CA law. The rule for text output may be limited to the EU AI Act, which Anthropic notes as a reason in the linked article about its implementation.
https://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.php?id=427&t=3
reply