I agree. When did we, the tech set, become so arrogant?

We? There is no monolith here, this is individual arrogance from people who believe AI is driving us to the end of history

Could just be the first catchy short-enough url they could find.

I find e-ink screens infinitely more pleasant to look at than *LED

I know that’s the point, but I also know some people care more than others. I happen to be one of those who cares a lot.

E-ink tablets are also much more pleasant to hold for prolonged reading sessions!

That's true for smaller readers such as the Kindle or B&N Nook - I've had half a dozen Nooks. Now I use a 10" Boox device. I love the thing, but only when it's on the table. It is too heavy and far too slippery to hold. I even stuck sticky plastic table covering onto the back of the thing to make it nicer to hold instead of the cold, slippery aluminium. But it's still far too heavy.

My next device will be no heavier than 200 grams, and will not have a metal backing.

I find that sittin laterally on a couch or chaise lounge the tablet fits really nicely on my lap. But I agree, if the exact same tablet was like 9 inch and half the weight, it would be the perfect device for so many activities.

Is that because they're lighter-weight plastic? That would appear to be one of the primary differences between a Kindle (until recently) and an iPad...

Disclaimer: I am not qualified to give investment advice, I’m just an average tech worker who spent some amount of time on bogleheads forums.

I personally don’t invest more in tech than I need to via broad index funds (and I certainly never keep my RSUs in the company stock, I always sell immediately). Otherwise, if there is a sector-wide downturn, I’d be triple exposed - my paycheck, my tech investments, and my company stock. That seems like a lot of risk to take on.

I’m open to other opinions here.

Which game would you rather play:

   A. Guaranteed $1,000 each month
   B. Every month, flip a coin. Heads gains $5,000, tails you lose $1,000.

Obviously B has greater expected return, but losing $1,000 hurts. What if you can't pay the rent that month?

To me, that's SPY vs. QQQ. Tech in general has higher expected return, but more volatility. If you can handle the volatility, then QQQ is better. If not, then not.

Ultimately, I'm taking a bet on tech because I believe tech has the greatest chance of improving the economy/world.

[I'm also not qualified, so do your own research]

For other's interested in leveraged ETFs please see this excellent piece from Ben Felix: https://youtu.be/E7pl0tqzIUQ?si=py-3Uy1wb_yG3e5U

Neither QQQ nor SPY is a leveraged fund.

You made the mistake of looking too closely

The companies whose insane valuation is based on accomplishing thing X say they’re getting closer to accomplishing thing X?

At least they’re led by trustworthy and honest people or we’d need to take their claims with some dose of skepticism.

If I’m going to be seeing the people I work with as much as I see my family, I’m going to try to make some friends. I’d argue the bigger risk is not making friends at work given the loneliness epidemic, especially among middle aged and older men.

This is a good version of that design style though

so, promoting?

I would not characterize it thus.