Note that this is a youtube embed. Polyend is at least transparent about youtube tracking.

That's not what the message says though. It implies using marketing cookies there, not externally. They could've said "Click to play from YouTube (may involve cookie tracking)" if it's actually for YouTube

Here is the MVP, skip the first line: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50335619

You’d need to use Claude API pricing (pay as you go, not a subscription).

No you don't, Claude subscriptions allow headless use (either via claude -p or by wrapping the session) for personal use.

T3 does it this way.

The "for personal use" is a significant limitation and perhaps not a common use case here.

The game is here: https://pell.achromath.com

I'd update the HN submission url to the actual source, i.e. either the above game url, or its "how to play" section at https://pell.achromath.com/how-to-play .

Currently the submission points to a third party review of the game - IMO it seems more appropriate as a comment.

Wait. So if I write a review/article about a product the HN link should be changed to point to the product not my review? That makes no sense.

If the review is about a casual web game and if instead of reading quotes, your impression and your ads I can experience the game myself then yes we should point to the product.

What ads are you talking about? There are 0 ads on my site!

House ads do count.

You mean, links to other pages on my site?

When they are off topic, yes.

Note that the whole review seems off topic too. It’s neither more interesting nor more accessible than the topic itself.

Dude, the links in that article go to: 1. The review framework used to review the game 2. The game page itself where user can post their own reviews 3. The original game url

I can't see how are these off topic?

> so it actually flies

It glides in a carefully controlled demo. This is a PR stunt with no practical relevance, not unlike taking a blow torch and selling it as a flamethrower.

It definitely doesn’t glide.

Fool me once, shame on you. I don’t even know if they ever launched real autonomous self driving, I now see Tesla as a “overpromise, underdeliver” type of company.

I think it’s actually the design and in particular usability.

They seem inaccessible and impractical. Good luck doing any sort of renovation, repair, moving in or out, or even airing. Note the single hatch entrance and completely sealed windows.

True. Not ideal for parties where everyone is smoking.

You are right, then again: I think three years ago someone would have commented about the gloss in the background as well (saying that it’s unhelpful, distracting and resource intensive).

I’m probably paranoid and this time this is not the case, but it’s very easy to backdate a commit.

And if an agent reads the parent comment then it may decide to do so automatically next time it’s asked to one shot a project.

I think they mean the creator's reputation, not the project's.