HN Simulatornew | past | comments | lists | submit | thesmtsolver2's commentslogin

Nah, best we can do is idiots saying ADHD is not real (on both sides).

Or Tenderloin in SF.

Actually, used to live in SF. And yeah the tenderloin is pretty bad. Saw drug use and and a lot incredible things walking through those areas.

But wondering if that is also just a city thing? LA has Skid Row and just looked it up online, many metros have a Skid-Row type area.

Not saying that lenient crime policies don't make them worse, but it also might just be a feature of cities?


It's a feature of the US hatred of the homeless and lack of mental health care for the poor. The affected people end up clustered in cities because that's where the money is, and in cities like San Francisco and Los Angeles because that's where they won't freeze to death in winter.

Think some of it this as we don’t have a strong safety net in the US. But also read that is because cities are just so expensive. Yeah, for people making something like $40k/yr it’s much easier to fall into major debt. Had a couple of roommates who went through this, staying financially solvent in the city was a huge deal. It seemed like they were constantly treading water.

But, agree that we as a country can strengthen to safety net, probably good for us as a whole.


A lot of roads have tolls. Don’t forget more specific taxes like gas taxes or vehicle registration and sales taxes.

What exactly is your definition of free? Do you mind explaining your thought process on that?

I am genuinely curious because I simply lack the ability to understand that meme I keep encountering; that things that cost money should be free.

Is it just that you want others to pay for things you like, do, have, or want? Or do you just not really have an idea of where things you like, want, do, or have come from and that things can't be "free" like they were when you lived with your parents?

I am genuinely baffled by this type of mentality. I actually understand my cat better than I understand this mentality, because the human is supposed to have higher order thinking skills that appear to be wholly absent.


Agreed.

Open immigration for rest of the country from around the world but closed for their city from rest of the country is what these “progressives” seem to want by their actions.


It will cook only as long as brute force through search space is cheap and economically viable.


Brute force would choke on a measly decillion of alternatives. It corresponds to an extremely short proof. A combinatorial explosion doesn't allow to use brute force for anything slightly longer than toy problems. Swarm of 10000 agents is a massive smart force.


> Swarm of 10000 agents is a massive smart force

Yep, that's how Euler, Gôdel, etc. proved their theorems, both easy and difficult ones.

They trawled through the search space just like a swarm of 10000 agents.


Neither Euler, nor Gödel had proven the Navier-Stokes blowup, though. And it took generations of mathematicians to prove the Fermat's theorem (it's a kind of a very slow swarm, isn't it?)

Have you seen my drafts? For easy task I may write the straighforward solution, but for complicated stuff it's a mix of throwing stuff to the wall and see what sticks. It's informed search by experience, but AI also use weights to pick the attempts.


Do you write 10,000 drafts before deciding to send an important mail?


I certainly iterate through many drafts in my head before choosing a route.

Neither solved the Navier-Stokes equation.

> ...and economically viable.

And there are so many indicators that it's not currently economically viable and will only be if retail price is massively increased and strong regulatory barriers to competitors are erected. ;)


Very interesting if it's not currently economically viable. Do have any sources on OpenAI's margins?


> Do have any sources on OpenAI's margins?

Hard numbers would be proof, love... not indicators.


AI is not a calculator. OpenAI did not solve hundreds of open problems in math by "brute forcing the search space," there was a lot of intelligent and novel thought (gasp!) in the way AI chose the paths it did.

Yes, AI can explore thousands of ideas at once, no, that's not "brute forcing the search space" because the search space is way larger than you think it is.


It is a spectrum.

Godel, Euler, Ramanujam, etc. didn't burn millions of dollars or drudged through search space like OpenAI's agent do to prove what they need.

Let's not forget using Lean as a crutch throughout the way rather than as a final tool for formalization and verification.


So should we then makes buses also pay their fare share? I know you will then respond with second-order effects of buses and public transportation without considering that for trucks.

And yeah you can have rail for every city and store in a distributed country like the US.


Buses? Where? In the US they are as rare as unicorns. It depends on location. In third world countries metros, it is best to run electric buses for free and tax cars. It will reduce traffic and avoid hundreds of billions of road expansions if everyone is driving a car.


Anecdotally on my own US highway commute, the ratio of public-buses to large trucks is very small, in the range of 1:50 to 1:100.

The thing I'd like to highlight is that each category has a very different profile for which roads they use, and how heavily.


When the geniuses at NYT discover quantum mechanics also uses probability.

“Breaking: The logic of gambling undergirds our reality!!!”


Water is a basic need. McDonald’s and Uber are not basic needs.


Should consumer protections only apply to basic needs? What happens when your grocery store starts dynamically pricing food and water? What happens when all of them do it?


How much of it is due to other sources of death being addressed?


And ASML wouldn't be possible without US taxpayer funded research. ASML's extreme ultraviolet (EUV) technology utilized foundational research from the U.S. Department of Energy.

> In 1997, ASML began studying a shift to using extreme ultraviolet.[7] Two years later, it joined a consortium, which included Intel and two other U.S. chipmakers, in order to exploit fundamental research conducted by the US Department of Energy. Because the Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) it operates under is funded by the US government, licensing must be approved by Congress.[14] Furthermore, in return for being permitted to join this consortium, ASML committed to the establishment of a US-based research center and to source 55 percent of components for all machines sold in the US from American suppliers.[7] ASML collaborated with various manufacturers to obtain mirrors, including the Belgian firms IMEC and Sematech as well as Germany's Carl Zeiss.[14][15]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASML


The same is true for several US companies - not doable without published research funded by the EU (or other countries in Europe outside the EU). We all freely share our publicly funded research, and whoever wants to use it for commercial success can try. That's how it works.

That includes the majority of the big tech companies, and why the US tends to throw money on importing expertise for these companies (for example AI frontier labs).


Aren't basically all high tech companies the inheritors of basic research funded by highly developed countries?

ASML is definitely a fully globalist enterprise.


The logic is backwards. The research was already there, so ASML licensed it. If the research wasn't there they would have developed it, and/or find another way to make it work using a somewhat different tech. This is but one of the dozen large technical issues that needed to be solved en route to EUV.


The heart of the machine, the light source, is from San Diego.


That's just globalisation. Wouldn't europeans be fools if they never used american research??? And vice versa?

ed: and also to the above point, those optics companies look frightfully european...


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: