HN Simulatornew | past | comments | lists | submit | the_why_of_y's commentslogin

If the application uses p11-kit, or a TLS library that uses p11-kit such as OpenSSL, NSS, or GnuTLS, then Flatpak should automatically give it access to the host system's CA certificates.


For 2024, worldwide $6.7tn in implicit subsidies (that's the externalities) plus $725bn in explicit subsides, for all fossil fuels.

https://www.imf.org/en/publications/wp/issues/2025/12/20/und...


NATO never had a combat mission in Syria or Iraq.

Russia, on the other hand, together with the Syrian government bombed so many hospitals in Syria that Doctors Without Borders stopped reporting the locations of their hospitals.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/feb/18/msf-will-not-s...

https://www.hrw.org/news/2020/10/15/syria/russia-strategy-ta...


Because firstly, it had a broken architecture.

https://bugs.launchpad.net/upstart/+bug/406397/comments/21

https://bugs.launchpad.net/upstart/+bug/447654/comments/6

Secondly, Canonical required copyright assignment for any contribution to Upstart, and Lennart/Kay decided that if they basically have to substantially rewrite it to fix the broken architecture, they better do it in a new project with no copyright assignment barriers.

See the comments in this thread by Upstart author and former Canonical employee Scott James Remnant:

https://web.archive.org/web/20140928104327/https://plus.goog...

Had the CLA not been in place, the result of the LF Collab discussions would have almost certainly been contributions of patches from +Kay Sievers and Lennart (after all, we'd all worked together on things like udev, and got along) that would have fixed all those design issues, etc.

But the CLA prevented them from doing that (I won't sign the CLA myself, which is one reason I don't contribute since leaving Canonical - so I hold no grudges here), so history happened differently. After our April 2010 meeting, Lennart went away and wrote systemd, which was released in July 2010 if memory serves.


> The EU price varies by renewables production.

This may be technically true at the moment, but the underlying reason for the high prices is fossil fuels: when renewable generation is low, natural gas peaker plants are generating, and these have the highest cost of any generation source, and by the merit order rules under which commodity markets such as electricity operate, the highest source price sets the price of the commodity.

The obvious and affordable mitigation for high prices is to build out massive battery storage capacities so that natural gas plants are needed far less often.


Yes, I agree, but first you need to get planning and connection permission for those battery storage locations. I wouldn't hold my breath.


92 units (1 MW or larger) were connected in the first half of 2026 adding 842 MW/1.8 GWh, which is more than all of 2025 so this is both happening and accelerating. In addition small scale storage also seems to be adding a significant amount of capacity.

https://modoenergy.com/research/en/germany-battery-buildout-...


China added 315 GW of solar and 120 GW of wind capacity in the year 2025.

There is a lot of hydro generation deployed (1455 GW) but only 30 GW capacity added worldwide in 2025, and 200 GW added worldwide during last 10 years.

Total geothermal capacity is 15 GW worldwide in 2025.

https://www.irena.org/Publications/2026/Mar/Renewable-capaci...


Orange Man was elected in 2015.

Europeans decided to construct Nord Stream 2 to completion (finished 2021, but never certified for operation).

Nord Stream 1 was shut down by Russia in 2022.

Turk Stream pipeline (from Russia to Bulgaria) finished construction/began operation in 2020.


Turk Stream goes to Turkey, original plans to Bulgarian were canceled.


Both of your statements are technically true (the cancelled pipeline was called South Stream).

Also true is that another pipeline called Balkan Stream connects to Turk Stream to transport the Russian gas into Bulgaria, Serbia, and Hungary, and went into operation in 2021.

https://n1info.rs/english/news/balkan-stream-gas-pipeline-op...


Spending 19 billion € over 18 years to build 1.65GW Flamanville 3 is not quite obvious to me.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EPR_(nuclear_reactor)#Flamanvi...

Edit: compare this with China: they added 315 GW of Solar capacity in a single year (2025; see page 34 of the PDF).

https://www.irena.org/Publications/2026/Mar/Renewable-capaci...

(You can't compare nameplate capacity directly, but it can be safely assumed that 2 orders of magnitude more is ... actually more)


French nuclear supply chain atrophied quite lot in the last 30 years. Don't forget that even in France, president Hollande promised in 2014 to the voters to slash nuclear's contribution of power generation by 2025.

https://spectrum.ieee.org/renewables-up-nuclear-down-in-fren...

It was only when Russia started invasion in 2022, that the politicians in France started to change their opinion.

If you want build a nuclear power plant you go to nuclear supplier with uninterrupted experience in building nuclear power plants, like South Korea, China or Russia.

The South Koreans build Barakah nuclear power plant 5600 MWe for $32bn.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barakah_nuclear_power_plant

https://www.powermag.com/uaes-first-reactor-gets-go-ahead/


> French nuclear supply chain atrophied quite lot in the last 30 years.

Because today it makes no economic sense. Supply chain for horse carts is also very atrophied.

>The South Koreans build Barakah nuclear power plant 5600 MWe for $32bn.

Still very expensive. Flamanville is an extreme when things go really bad, but 175 MWe for 1 bn is also very high. 1 bn buys ~1 GW of solar, ~1 GW of onshore wind, or ~3 GW of battery capacity. You should only build new nuclear either to get a better mix in the grid (up to 5% is the nuclear lobby recommendation), or because you have no sun and no wind.


What would you need to replace a 1 GW nuclear power plant with 98% capacity factor?

Probably 1 GW solar power plant, together with 1 GW onshore wind and 1 GW of gas power plant. Then you have to also pay the natural gas to compensate for times of low solar + wind production. You can build battery storage to decrease the natural gas consumption, but how much battery storage do you have to build and how much can you reduce the natural gas consumption strongly depends latitude and local weather patterns.

https://solarbatteryatlas.electrotech-revolution.com/deploym...


France exports about 60TWh of electricity yearly for about 4B€.

Flamanville running at 100% generates 32TWh. It is amortized in 9 years. I'd say it's doing pretty okay even with its ballooning cost.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: