not sure if that makes it better for you, but usually you are knocked out and don't know what is happening during the procedure. Much worse is the preparation starting days before with disgustingly tasting things that intentionally give you diarrhea (and maybe make you puke) to clear the path, and no food at all

People get a safe but vile-tasting laxative by default. If you don't have any known problems with your colon then you could ask for a faster-acting laxative that is easier to get down.

I have a condition so I have a colonoscopy every year. Once I had found out about there being a fast-acting option, I've always chosen that.

I've never done it sedated. I prefer to watch the screen and and ask questions. I've found the view quite fascinating, actually. The doctors and nurses have always been professional, focused on the colon: not the butt. There is absolutely nothing sexual about it. I've never felt pain: only some tension, and that's been because of gas (needed to get a clear view). It is perfectly safe unless your colon has some illness of some sort. The worst part has always been the prep.

Yea I know, my life just isn't worth living and I'd prefer not to have something shoved up my ass to prevent something that could end it early cuz I am too foolish to do it myself.

That seems very subjective, can you elaborate? I think the results can be worked with

The 'cyberpunk' one is incredibly bland and uninspired. That may be the goal of the political site, as a form of satire.

But reducing a style with a wealth of cultural material to draw on (literature, fashion, cinema, gaming, industrial design) to 'dark with turquoise/pink highlights, cut corners on rectangles, some random diagonal lines, some token Japanese characters and a lazy neon-style logo' feels like a miss.

If this was from a human designer I was working with, I'd be having a serious conversation about effort.

then he always was prince, just nobody knew?

people didn't like the candidates or politics the democrats pushed.

>"were the atomic bombs the worst atrocity of all time? They weren't even the worst of that war!"

that's debatable. like, worst single instance atrocity? possibly is

I mean, even only considering bombing raids, more people were killed during the various fire bombing campaigns against japanese cities and so on, granted those took 1000 planes instead of 1, but somehow I doubt the people burning to death considered that a meaningful distinction.

Thank you for your service, I had the same itch when I read "boox"