Try using Astra, Fable, Opus.

Sol 6.1 is really good too though

> and those are the same ones claiming the vertical curve.

Do you still write code by hand?

> AI companies are bad at making software

Isnt Chatgpt one of the most successful product of all time?

> Isnt Chatgpt one of the most successful product of all time?

Lets assume that is true[1], all that says is that OpenAI has the best marketing of all time.

The best products are frequently not the highest-selling.

-------------------------------

[1] Depends on how you are measuring "success". If you're measuring it by revenue as a percentage of all products, it's probably not even in the top-ten.

Depends on what your metric is. If you care about profitability it could turn out to be the least successful product of all time.

By software they mean "application". Obviously chatgpt is software.

Chatgpt is an application for the underlying model. Most users dont care about the model they care about Chatgpt the App.

something selling a lot doesn't mean it's good. Is McDonald's good food? by some metrics of course it is. But if someone says McDonald's makes bad food, I know what they mean

Mumbai got the sweet heart treatment.

Moving from Mumbai to Pune in early 2000's was like going back to a village with 3 hour power cuts in Summer.

> and raise the price of electricity 5x.

People wont vote for them if they increased the price by 5x.

And then there’s the small matter of it being financially ruinous for the poorest people

common misconception. In fact, it would probably be cheaper for most people since they wouldn't have to own a generator (or pay for use of someone elses).

Instead, people (especially the poorest) would need to put effort into tracking their own usage - and understanding that an airconditioner uses far more electricity than a phone charger.

This seems completely out-of-touch with reality, and absolutely insults the intelligence of the poorest people

With higher energy cost, People who could afford ACs would pay off the linemen to connect the AC directly bypassing the meter.

Dishonest representation. The links provided do not show this at all, but very clearly that it has been isolated incidents that people extrapolate into false evidence.

> but very clearly that it has been isolated incidents

Ant denied them at first though.

Good Artists Copy, Great Artists Steal - Steve Jobs

That has a very different meaning than literal stealing.

"Stealing" changes definitions every few years now, most recently with the mainstream suddenly deciding RIAA and news publishers are no longer the scum of the Earth but their new best friends, and reversing previous definition to now include IP transgression as theft, just so they can say AI companies are stealing shit.

Yes, but the quote about art has nothing to do with that.

The quote says that many artists borrow, meaning everyone still knows who did the original work and the artist is just riffing on it. But great artists transform the work so completely that it becomes theirs.

This was exactly what I meant yes.

billionaires all steal dont try to make good examples from their toxic psycho attitudes.

You tell Opus to do it.

Which models are you using.

All the models output mixed data (errors). The larger is the context, the bigger the probability to happen. And this is an inherent property of LLMs (the output is a statistical concatenation of text, the LLMs are an vectorial database filled statistically).

If you connect an LLM to pilot a plane with passengers, prepare the obituaries, because would happen sooner or latter, an undesired index got mixed and produced a mixed/wrong output. But here, the bigger mistake would be to let an LLM execute commands without human revision, aimed by the deceptive marketing around the A"I" (LLMs).