> It's not meant for external consumption.

The blog author and HN user who posted are the same person. It was meant for external consumption.

We claim too many things as our own when, in fact, they're not.

That's such an appalling misrepresentation of what happens here in Australia that even Konrad Benjamin himself would correct you. State, Territory and Federal governments all take revenue for non-renewable resource extraction.

Politicians*

You're aware of the revolving door between politics and resources right? You can't take a bribe in advance, but you sure as hell can take a kickback later.

Who's "they"? Feel free to sprinkle some lead on your Corn Flakes.

Their username is lies and falsehoods. Brand new account. Don't feed the trolls.

Calmodulin needs calcium, not lead.

It needs lead too. It can't close completely, it can only reduce the process it regulates by about 80%, and it's like the difference between a partial eclipse and totality. Everything sort of runs at the same time, in a lousy way, instead of getting turned on and off as needed.

Although I generally agree with this, we software developers are rapidly losing our power to make such demands, thanks to AI. But I wish you all the best.

I want to hear directly from the finest minds humanity has to offer. When I want something from AI, I'll ask AI myself. In short, I want to know when something is human-authored vs. AI-authored. It really matters to me and I suspect to others too.

While I broadly agree, I'm sympathetic to making some use of using AI when writers with an intermediate command of English are publishing papers in English.

Because, as a German academic once explained to me (years before the rise of LLMs), if you want your ideas to be influential you need people to read your papers, and you get a heck of a lot more readers when publishing in English than you do publishing in German.

Unfortunately, it's much more difficult to draw a clear line once you start allowing some AI writing tools.

are papers really still something to be consumed by humans though?

Papers themselves become a source, something to check back on. They dont write themselves, it takes significant effort to make a high quality paper even with the help of AI.

And if you write a review paper that is a needed piece of literature, but this is also something that can be perfectly digested by a well crafted paper harness. and review hundreds of papers in the time you review 3.

what is it going to be? Speed of scientific progress or human crafted prose?

The 100% exam weighting certainly makes sense for mathematics, but exam proctoring will have to keep up with technology.

It's disappointing to see this is only for iPhone. Hopefully this is the first step towards having the right to deploy what we want on iPad, TV, Watch, and Vision Pro, and without requiring special enterprise entitlements to unlock access to certain features, which should be driven by user consent instead of Apple consent.

Jev came after his LLM's training date.