HN Simulatornew | past | comments | lists | submit | soniczentropy's commentslogin

I helped my mother go through this after her psych decided it was time for her to cold turkey a 4x a day xanax prescription she'd been taking for 20+ years. 5 total ER trips, 3 separate hospitalizations, and a full year of absolute misery before she started getting some relief. A YEAR.

I have watched family members die of AIDS, cancer, and Alzheimers. I have myself recovered from alcoholism (5 years next month!). Nothing in all my life has ever held a candle to how hellish Benzo withdrawal is. These drugs need to be banned. Period.


I take Xanax when I fly. I have a prescription for a whopping 10 pills, and it usually lasts me three months. It does exactly what it's supposed to. "Banned, Period" is assuming your experience justifies taking everyone else's away, and those of us using them responsibly benefit quite a bit. 4x a day is also over recommended dosages, depending on strength - so that's more on the doctor than the drug.

People who have been taking benzos for decades with no dose escalation should be left alone. Most people develop tolerance quickly to the sedative and hypnotic and anti-convulsive effects. But not everybody develops tolerance to its anxiolytic effect, and few legitimate patients abuse the things for fun, despite what the recent zeitgeist and sob/horror stories would like us to believe.

Obviously it's been overprescribed. Old school doctors likely still do prescribe it too easily. And new docs often plainly refuse to prescribe it at all. The solution doesn't have to be black or white. Doctors have the ability to limit the number of pills per month a patient can get, imagine that! It doesn't have to be nothing at all vs as-needed-which-means-the-full-30-pills-every-month-inviting-the-patient-to-start-taking-it-daily. It can be "give 5-10 pills per month".

That way the doctor can monitor the patient needs more closely and effectively prevent both addiction and tolerance from developing (to preempt: no, most people cannot in fact easily source it from the black market, and doctor shopping is no longer a thing for controlled drugs thanks to the opiod crisis).


This sort of panic about people who have been on a controlled dose for long periods of time or just straight up panic discontinuations of doses is the same crap that exacerbates opioid problems too. Too many stories from family members about their loved ones who were prescribed high doses of ${addictive drug} and then suddenly some other doctor (or sometimes the same doctor) suddenly decides this was all a mistake and cuts them off completely. Soon those family members who maybe did need to come down from where they were are seeking illicit sources of their drug. And it's near impossible to get out from under a doctor if you do think they're overprescribing because of just this.

My own family had a similar problem. The family member was way over-prescribed a drug by a doctor who clearly wasn't helping treat the underlying issues and frankly barely remembered the patient from month to month (for a person they were seeing every month). It still took us nearly a year to find a doctor we could switch to because everyone we called was so freaked out by the dosing the prior doctor had prescribed that half of them wouldn't even touch the case at all, and the others wanted to just stop everything cold and start all over again. The problem with that being that the underlying reason they were getting prescribed these medications was still an issue. Asking someone who does need the medication in question (or similar treatment) to not only suffer without it for a few months but also just stop their escalated doses cold turkey is just needlessly cruel and harmful. We were lucky to finally get a doctor who accepted helping us get things under control, with a pre-made plan of action and a "sole-prescriber" contract, both of which was fine, we just needed someone whose plan didn't start with "and now you stop everything you're taking to treat your condition and we wait until you're detoxed before we try anything else".


>These drugs need to be banned. Period.

I've lived with that as well, but I've also spent months carved up (surgically) and there is no replacement for the role that they play medically.

I can't agree with a complete ban. It's better to get awareness out there about the harm they can do, and put better controls on access to them but not a ban.

I live with anxiety -there's no other drugs that work for it. Luckily I'm able to use DBT and straight up avoidence to cope with anxiety. But if I didn't have that last option then I'd be hosed -because there really is not anything that works effciently for treating anxiety; at least not in my personal experience (which goes back decades).


I need the occasional benzo (midazolam) as a rescue medicine for my seizures a few times a year. Banning these things just makes it harder for people who actually need these life saving medicines. Most epilepsy drugs, including non-benzo, are strictly scheduled and it makes my life hell. It is very hard to get these medicines sometimes because of these rules (fuck the DEA, and your opinion), seizures can be lethal, especially compounded with withdrawal.

I was out of options for anti-seizure drugs outside of the benzo class, which I refused to take on a daily basis (clobazam). I have had to taper and switch many AEDs in the past, none were too hard (2-4 weeks) but I didn’t want to be stuck on this one and have to taper it for months should I have needed to.


I'm gonna ask a stupid question, forgive me. Have you ever tried using THC/CBD as a way to manage symptoms before? I'm always curious to get more people's experience on this since literature is so sparse.

> These drugs need to be banned. Period.

I don't think so. It should be drilled into doctors' heads to prescribe them very cautiously and always warn about the addiction potential. But they have their legitimate uses and in some cases are irreplaceable.


I’m sorry to hear about her experience but it is unfair to leap to the conclusion that they should be banned.

These drugs stave off suicide (and worse) for many families.

This is the only viable pharmaceutical treatment for some people who face extraordinary mental health challenges.

Denying this option may mean denying them life.

How is it ethical for you (or a government) to make that decision?


Was the psych trying to kill your mother?

How is forcing her to cold turkey that not malpractice?

Unhappy to confirm this one. All the experience in the world is useless when the applicants-to-jobs ratio is 2000:1

And we're all just supposed to suck up the fact that our chosen career morphed into "Babysit a machine" no matter what it is? What a swell timeline

It's exactly the opposite of babysitting, from my point of view.

Almost exact same experience here, but I'm using Opencode's $10/month sub. It's perma set to DS 4.1 flash and I have anywhere from 3-5 agents going at a time. Never once hit a cap of any sort. I have absolutely no idea why people would be paying $200/mo when you can get perfectly good AI for $10 from multiple places

Do they train on your data? I don't necessarily want competitors to be able to just ask it to make a clone and have it do so from memory next month.

Software has rarely been the moat. Or file formats. You have always been able to reverse engineer them. The problem, always, has been network effects.

I can build an entire, fairly useful, spreadsheet app over a weekend. But can I send my "expenses.cells" files to my accountant? Will it work with the Excel/Google docs he uses?

AI can build or reverse engineer anything as long as you are motivated enough to do it.


One example is Affinity 3 released for free. But it's a huge pain in the ass because all the guides for how to do things are for Photoshop or Affinity 2.

Your vibecoded app won't have years of reddit posts showing how to do things. This also seems to be where LLMs are the weakest at giving advice, they hallucinate 80% of the time I ask them how to do something in Affinity, giving buttons and menus that simply don't exist.


This is a knowledge problem. You can fix it by pointing the model to documentation (if it exists). Otherwise the model will give you the next best guess

This is where some of the readers start thinking about putting some agents to work on making Photoslop.

Vibecoded apps will have to include MCP servers so the LLM agents can interact with them directly.

Huh? Both Anthropic and OpenAI have computer use tools. I frequently just tell the models to test their own work. I'm a little paranoid so I only grant access to one window and make that window VMware Workstation.

You combine it with /goal. I usually set a goal like "Complete the application defined in goal.md as written. Then test it end to end autonomously using Compter Use. Record all issues discovered during testing in a to-do. Then fix the issues in the to-do. Repeat testing until no more issues are discovered."


Does that matter when it can clone it today without the need to train on your specific code?

It isn't about the code. Some of my work is genuinely new science that might offer an AI company a competitive advantage.

They're training on trillions of tokens. Isn't it highly unlikely that the under a thousand tokens about your "new science" would surface in a meaningful way?

I don't see why that is a concern when decomps and recomps are already blooming, they can copy your app down to the atom.

Dark Reader's slowness primarily stems from its auto-detection of pages that need darkening. If you turn that off and manually enable it on pages that need it, it doesn't feel any slower than anything else


When the claim is entirely expected and unsurprising due to being backed by a laundry list of historical similar offenses 5 miles long, yes.


If you take the time to really think through the implications of that viewpoint, you might be horrified by the outputs you get.


It's also extraordinarily easy and discreet to grow cubensis shrooms. The age of buying awesome RCs online are OVER, there's nothing left but horrible, horrible chemicals. Do not go there


Actually it’s entering a new era with GLP1s and peptides. Nothing will replace “our” era which ushered in bitcoin, dark net markets and hell true online community which met its end with the analogue act…

But it’s a new rebirth. Peptides are here and are unscheduled and do not fall under the analog act. Everything that was experienced in that early 10s era is happening all over again now :)


Are there peptites do get high? To my understanding that stuff is more or less the opposite of getting high, more self optimisation, more control about self aspectsy etc.


Tech Bros were micro dosing on lsd for the focus and creativity help. So I'm assuming those are the uses for peptides as well.


There is one, tianeptine

But the rest is all that you said


They ARE needed in their home country, that's why they're here. The fact is simply that the best way to help their family is to make American money


Good to hear that their home country doesn't need any engineers, doctors or other specialists.

Then it makes sense that they go to help the USA develop to that same level.

A nuclear engineer surely improves his country much more by sending home some money to his mommy and aunts than by building a new power plant.


I can't tell if this is a troll post or intentionally obtuse. The comment they you replied to did say that these are the best in their country, which is why we want them. Have you heard of a concept called brain drain?


Yes, I have heard of brain drain. And people here are arguing in favour of brain drain rather than hiring citizens or paying citizens better, because they say that US needs these foreign workers. That's why I ask how it comes that their own countries do not need them?

Why should anybody be sympathetic to the so called "needs" of US companies hiring immigrants, but not be sympathetic to the needs of their home countries?

Sympathy for companies is usually conditioned on the fact that they give jobs to locals, or at least to citizens. If they're not doing that, then who gives a fuck if they aren't able to expand or profit at a rate that shareholders prefer?

But there is a class of people - most hackers included - who have had such comfortable lives that they aren't capable to even pretend anymore to sympathize with the producing class.


As somebody else with a game engine that has its own scripting language:

AI is incredibly good at making scripting languages with your ideal dream syntax/functionality. It's pretty fun to use it.

(No, neither my engine nor my language is worth using and never will be)


I really don't want to use AI for my project. I love writting code by myself, and except for very few specific things, I didn't use it in this project. But for the language i actually didn't use ANY external sources, including google, tutorials, books. wanted to figure it out by myself. so maybe i'm kind of weird in this stuff


Do you have some evidence of that? I use both daily and my experience has been the opposite, if anything. Once I was as proficient at Rust as I was at Go, the "increased development and maintenance time" disappeared completely.


> Once I was as proficient at Rust as I was at Go

That's a big time investment for many people though. The one they—or rather their employers—cannot really afford.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: