I agree with this. I think the researchers who's harnessing the llm's power should be credited more than the model itself. We also need to understand the thought process and the prompts that are given to the model so we can learn and collab to ensure humanity's progress as much as the llm itself.

> I think the researchers who's harnessing the llm's power should be credited more than the model itself.

Even when the report literally says the LLM did it on its own?

Let's not over-correct in the direction of knowing better than the first party.

> the report literally says the LLM did it on its own

Not mention it also says this...

> We are still analysing the GPT–6 Astra logs to see exactly how it executed the break.

‘knowing what problems are worth solving —- priceless”.

For everything else, there’s Astracard

It also decided which problem to solve:

"After analysing the unbroken messages on the website, it decided that the most promising message was Nr. 172, MVUEH and it also quickly suspected that the plaintext of Nr. 173, SIPVX ..."

Why? Sounds like they played no role in solving it besides presenting the problem.

Is this because they are publishing new model maybe?

If you want to "edit" a PDF, then Claude Sonnet works well, although what it's going to do is regenerate it from scratch trying to retain overall formatting. It can even do this for scanned PDFs and foreign language ones that need translating.

If you just need to create PDFs, not edit them, then Gemini notebook (notebook.google) works well and has Google's usual very high free usage limits.

AFAIK in general you can't really edit PDFs since it's not a reflowable format - even with Adobe tools all that editing does is modify the text within a text box - not reflow the document to adjust to any change in size of the text box.

You probably mean 3.5-flash? Pro is still good for a lot of use cases, but it seems it's still officially in the "preview" phase.

3.5 pro doesn't exist yet?

Sorry my bad, I messed up the numbers, 3 and 3.1 pro. All of these model numbers have me confused

The only thing I miss in emacs is concurrency/multi-threading. Apart from that, it's a complete software for me. Anyone can build it to anyone's liking.

Emacs has primitive concurrency (see Chapter 40, Threads in the Elisp manual), and because it's a Lisp, having nice concurrency is just a matter of programming.

This is what we really need and others should focus on this, niche settings for AI implementations. We are already tired of seeing the same stuff come up again and again when using AI. This is the type of stuff that can make AI more enjoyable and useful

I am thinking about this too. I mean they have access to the highest level models and still they just produced a garbage.

I just left the website open by mistake and went to take a walk. The temp got 80 degree celcius. My laptop's chasis got really hot

This, I totally agree with you having a call and letting them explain the changes. One of my coworker used claude to write and push PR's and the message was so cryptic, it's not really understandable. I got him on a call and let him explain the PR. He also actually couldn't really interpret the PR message. I warned him not do this again. Now he writes by hand. I think communication between humans should be written by only humans. AI is not really good at communication.