Not really. The largest IQ4_XS quant here is still worth it because Bonsai doesn't offer larger quants. They could beat it if they made a quaternary variant though, I don't know why they're stopping at ternary.
I wonder the same thing for Bonsai 2. ByteShape offers 5 models from IQ2_XXS-2.56bpw (8.8GB), IQ3_XXS-2.88bpw (9.9GB), IQ3_XS-3.01bpw (10.4GB), IQ3_S-3.23bpw (11.0GB) to IQ4_XS-3.84bpw (13.1GB). Their benchmarks show gradual improvement with size and users can pick one to fit theirs need. Bonsai-2-27B now is about 8.6GB. It might be good to have a quaternary version around 10-11GB to fit a computer with 16-24GB RAM.
Disclaimer: I'm using reduced motion on my phone, please acknowledge this bias before reading my comment
All of those, citing the pricing page, "websites people remember" look the same and use the same handful of effects
- Fade in on scroll
- Big letters
- Punishment of firefox users
- Fullscreen imagery
- Cursor replacement
- Annoying takeover of browser scrolling
Of course you would be impressed if you see something like this the first time. If every third company has websites like this, it gets annoying. I don't remember any of them
They look cool on twitter, how they perform independently of it?
I miss "boring" landings. Pretty ones, not wordpress or wix slop, not "beautiful, that's hard to forget. Make no mistakes" ahem...
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49746618