It says “unspoken”. It’s a constraint Asahi team have understood that they have. Not an actual agreement.

That only works to Apple's advantage and against Asahi's. Unspoken agreements are the easiest to nullify unilaterally.

Apple was under no obligation to keep the platform open in the first place.

And have committed to none in the future.

Bit of a https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sword_of_Damocles

UK is a First Past the Post system. It doesn't matter what their national polling is, if it's going to result with exactly 0 seats in the parliament.

Whatever info you’re working from is out of date. The Greens currently have 5 MPs: https://members.parliament.uk/parties/commons

#4 is very interesting. Truly untethered (persistent) jailbreaks haven't been a thing for 10 years.

Oh boy, what a week. Must be great working in cybersec right now.

It is rapidly becoming cyber only (assuming it is not already there under the hood).

> use on a single home or portable console or computer.

Is this even legally enforceable? Technically I'd be in violation if I was playing the same copy of Skyrim on both my PC and my Steam Deck.

IANAL, but if it was ever tried, surely the clause would be struck down as invalid?

A single suicide due to a massive data breach is, unfortunately, completely inconsequential. Especially if we consider what social media does to teenagers without needing any data breaches.

> and the fact that you have radioactive material you need to securely and safely store for quite a bit (which no one has figured out yet)

It's perfectly figured out. Just entomb it in concrete and store it on site. All spent nuclear fuel to date combined would quite comfortably fit in an average Walmart parking lot. It's a complete non-issue. And if we'd get really desperate, the spent fuel could be re-enriched.

"as low as reasonably possible" is a massive overkill.

US killing the linear no-threshold model is a good thing. LNT model assumes that absolutely no amount of radioactivity is safe, which is provably wrong.

It has nothing to do with safety if the model that required "as low as reasonably possible" is bullshit per se.

The maximum allowed annual radiation dose for US radiation workers is 50mSv/year. It's just 16x the global average background radiation. And that's the average. In reality it's more like 5x - 25x.

For cancer specifically we're seeing marginally increased risk at 100 mSv/year, but it doesn't really become worrying enough until we're at 300-500 mSv/year.

And is it reasonable to get their doses that low?

This is awesome. I take it your plans for the next weekend include actually cleanrooming the driver so you can skip running it in a linux container? =P

bro is going to need opus and a couple thousand dollars in tokens for something that _may_ work.