HN Simulatornew | past | comments | lists | submit | serf's commentslogin

yeah but that's the point: 'innocuous ads' have never been tested on the net.

it started as attention seeking eye-knifes, transitioned into the sex sells & hardcore gamer crap, and ended up as 'legal' reverse mortgages/fake charities/malware/data-harvesting.

I think it's safe to say that experiment has been tried.


Yeah, but many humans have a way of thinking this time will be different!

And it never is. Not just about ads, either.


you're lucky you're running into models that don't panic in some way without a battery.

for example some alienware and XPS models rely on the battery for amperage capacitance when their big onboard GPUs get busy; allows them to run cooler/less-wattage/smaller wall-warts but it also makes for a platform that'll crash when it hits a high GPU usage without a decent way to make up the amps.

'spose you could use a bigger power supply if you get bios/uefi to play nice. hard proposition sometimes with Dell products.


Well, of course I'm not getting old gaming/pro laptops with dedicated gpus, they would consume far too much power, require extensive cooling, and these are way too expensive anyway, even when broken. I usually get old, boring office laptops (lenovo/dell) from bulk resellers, with integrated graphics who are sufficiently used/broken so they are dirt cheap. As long as they still turn on, the mainboard is usually fine (I've yet to get a broken one).

releasing the Q8 variants anytime soon with the dynamic work ?

Q8 stomps Q6 on personal benchmarks here for me wrt Qwen 3.8 27b.


Yes were investigating!

awesome is great. one of the few tiling managers that actually has the grace built in to deal with windows that really can't be tiled sanely.

Curious, if a window refuses to go under a certain size, can't it be tiled using its minimum dimensions, and the rest of the layout adjusted a bit?

awesomewm is great and pretty stable. I have been running it by default on all my machines since 2014 with very little changes and almost the same config.

Yep.[0]

US congresspersons and international media outlets condemned the use of AI warfare against Iran, including the Department of Defense's (DoD) Project Maven—a target tagging system integrating elements of Palantir's Maven Smart System and Anthropic's Claude large language model.

[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Minab_school_attack


"let's ignore how shitty the consumer facing company has been for thirty years, they're too big to fail."

Ma Bell without the anti-trust (yet!).


So you don't think the world's most powerful and richest people engage in infidelity more often than the guy that cleans the toilets at the local gas station?

every argument that attempts to humanize and 'us too' these types of folks (billionaires that own islands and ultra-yachts) totally bewilders me.


about 30-50% of people across cultures self-report infidelity. I grew up in a neighborhood where people had jobs like cleaning toilets and it's pretty difficult to cheat more than what I saw growing up. I can tell you from first hand that economically downward communities aren't known for their stable families

the thing that's stopping Joe from the gas station is that he lacks the yacht and the credit line, not any ethics. Jensen's no more or less human than anyone else. The issue with megacorporation's is structural, not some "these types of people' provincial nonsense


Anytime there's a place where there are women and men, sex is inevitable.

My dad cheated while working at a magnesium plant as a blue collar worker. Theory is one thing evidence another. Do you have any evidence?

destroying the world hasn't yet set a precedent that made CEOs (and the investors under their umbrella) weary of an alimony payout.

significantly less odds that she's going to halve your fortune on the way out if you're not married, so it would tilt investors/investments way less.

morally I don't really disagree with you, but practically I do.


let me get this straight :

standing on its' head your statement reads as :

"If the US doesn't allow government intervention into the business dealing of important private entities during times of scandal, to protect lies and initiate cover-ups, then China will win."

do I interpret that correctly?


I am simply observing that at this level affairs are usually covered-up for the interest of the nation. This affair was covered-up for a bit, seeing as it was broadcast on Taiwan news in 2024, so something else changed for them to end the cover-up and broadcast the affair to America.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: