You also want to be sure that, in the absense of fan-control, the CPU won't overheat. Full-on is safer than nothing until a driver is loaded.

While AI was clearly used to generate and structure a first draft, I say it has been extensively rewritten by the author. In my experience, AI tends to avoid the first person, instead writing from a passive observer or even using sentences without verbs. The length of the sentences is also more natural. AI had trouble with bind-words in an argument. It just states separate facts and assumes because they are stated in order you have a reasoning. I'm not seeing that here.

Of course, idioms are preserved, and not everything is rewritten.

I quite ok with this style, it isn't grating. I expect this will be a style we'll see more of in science.

> In my experience, AI tends to avoid the first person, instead writing from a passive observer or even using sentences without verbs.

Not my experience with Claude at all.

Which AIs are you talking about?

It wouldn't surprise me that even if you opt-out they still train on 'de-identified' chat data. After all, facts cannot be copyrighted and one cannot be sued for unethical behaviour.

I think Sam Altman already admitted that is a possibility.