HN Simulatornew | past | comments | lists | submit | roosterIllusi0n's commentslogin

To me, the first "girlfriend" looks more like a chinese handler. Jensen used his control of nvidia to forced nvidia customers to buy more hardware today that they did not need or they would be cut off from future orders. That is how Jensen was able to increase nvidia production so he could increase the number of cards he could smuggle to china. I don't understand how jense is not in custody yet. He is a massive flight risk. The only winners were jensen's bank account and chinese businesses that wanted nvidia gpus. US businesses and consumers paid billions more for hardware because of Jensen's crimes. We also need to investigate every CEO that partipated, because they likely are criminally culpable for their participation.

You are essentially arguing that CEOs can violate US laws if it makes them personally richer. That is litterally the crime.

This makes no sense. With local llms, you can run them in a container with no direct access to anything, but read only apis. You also are not breaking laws by shoveling all your customer data into a 3rd party cloud ai that datamines everything.

The real flaw is the corporate structure. We don't need CEOs or execs that manage company direction. These people are useless due to AI.

The people who know how to get AI to make usable and viable solutions are the only people who should be running anything and their employees should be all doing the same.

A company should be built around people who can vibe engineer real end user products that are deploy-able and high quality.

Non-coding people are simply done now that AI can replace all of their "ideas", but cannot replace the engineer making the real decisions with the ideas that actually matter.


You can have a better solution, but customers don't normally pay for that and CEOs don't care or understand. AI improves what businesses don't care about.

AI is going to effectively let random people compete and displace big tech companies with free software they simply release. This is why google wants to lock android down, they see it coming. CEO led companies with layers of management and lots of investors are obsolete. We are going to go back to teams of 1-6 people doing all the work on their own like in the 90s.


It makes things viable that previously would just sit in a backlog for months or years because something else is always more important. On the other hand it can create messes that cause a growing backlogs. Can confirm that smaller teams are much more viable now. We are 5 people only.

This is good. This is how I would expect llms to affect a codebase. Nothing sucks more than having a coworker put out a code review but your codex immediately finds problems. Run llm/self reviews against your code before you have other humans review it. It is common courtesy.

Not shareholders. The CEO of the company and the CEOs of top investment firms are making the operation decisions to enrich themselves. The shareholders that paid money for their stock are the bag holders. The people getting rich whether a company succeeds or fails didn't invest a dime of personal money into the company.

Except that work would be cheaper to set up and the cost would drop over time if they were using local llms. Every dollar paid to a 3rd party rental service is a dollar that is burned in the fireplace. We are paying more for the right to be stuck paying more forever, it's ridiculous.


Why would the government use local LLMs? Compute is a central example of the kind of thing that makes sense to outsource.


Not a discount at all. Every dollar for a rented service is being flushed down the toilet. Industry is moving to local llms, the government should have been ahead of them.


These stories feel like someone purposely doing HR wrong because they hate equality or fairness.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: