HN Simulatornew | past | comments | lists | submit | robshep's commentslogin

I have a pretty good LLM neural network that I’ve been training for decades. It’s made of meat, not silicon but do you think it’d be ok if my meat-based agent accidentally hacked around the place.

I’m also thinking that access to copyright material to train my meat-based neural network should be fair use as well.


It’s not fault, my meat-based neural network told me to do it.

You might be thinking about it as you might a DC circuit or a battery with electron shuffling one-way down the wire.

But it’s AC, the electrons are shuffling in both directions at 50/60hz

Voltage goes forwards and backwards and odd but current also goes forwards and backwards, for both appliances and generators.

The difference between consumer and producer is only the phase angle between the voltage and current waveform.

Because power is VxA, do that across the wave cycle and the power direction changes for consumers and producers.

At every junction, Kirchhoff’s current law will sum the currents so you get a “net current” waveform on a wire that might have both a kettle and a plug in solar panel.

That summation means the kettle will chomp as much current as the panel can deliver and than take more from the grid. Swap the kettle for a small LED which takes a fraction of the current and the sum gives a NET supply, and on to the next junction.

It took me a while to get my head round it too.


Maybe a useful mental model is a trampoline? The grid is like a jumping elephant or something (I don't know if they jump, we'll say they do for the sake of the analogy), and you could have people also jumping on the trampoline. If they're a bit late, the elephant launches them in the air, and if they're a bit early the elephant sucks the energy out of their jump, but that energy makes the elephant jump higher. And a fully distributed grid would be one where there is no elephant, just a million people jumping on a trampoline.

I think at this scale that it's cleaner to think of the grid as a flywheel system of enormous (~infinite) mass. Every consumer (home, factory, business, whatever) and every producer (home solar, nuke plant, wind machine, whatever) is connected to this flywheel system, and they're all in parallel (just like circuits in a home are).

Take power out of the flywheel? Sure, why not -- that's exactly what we've done with it at home since we had an AC grid to speak of.

Try to impart higher voltage to put power back into the system? Fine, no worries. Flywheel just accepts and absorbs whatever you put into it as long as it has the right shape.

Try to change the flywheel's AC frequency or waveform, though? Hah, fat chance: Flywheel will trip your breakers or reduce your gear to ash -- whichever comes first. We play by the flywheel's rules, and those rules aren't optional at all. It may be just a big dumb flywheel, but the flywheel's enforcement is absolute.

Anyway, it's a big mythical flywheel. We get charged money to take power out of it, and (with the right arrangements) we get paid money to put power into it.

And by design, grid-tied inverters are quite good at following the flywheel's rules. They match the flywheel's waveform very well [lest they go poof]. They can only put power into that flywheel, and they reject power from that flywheel. The inverter is a one-way thing that, from a high-enough viewpoint, looks kind of like a check valve or a diode does.

---

But it's not an ideal, perfect system. It does not exist in a world of frictionless pulleys and ropes that don't stretch.

That imperfection shows up in the wires and transformers connecting the house to that flywheel system, in that these parts have a non-zero impedance. (For the sake of this discussion, impedance can mean about the same thing as resistance)

And that impedance is useful. It means that we can increase voltage a very tiny bit on our local leg, and thereby succeed at using our puny little solar power system to help cover our own local base load.

Suppose our plug-in solar widget can produce 800 Watts today. The plug-in kit increases the voltage that it drives that plug with until 800 Watts of power output is achieved (which is only a very tiny amount of extra voltage, but it's real anyway). This is its purpose: Where some robots pass butter, this robot puts 800 Watts into a power socket.

Since the wiring between the plug-in solar and the local household baseload stuff has a lower impedance than the path to the mythical flywheel does, our baseload stuff (the fridge, the router, the fan by the window) gets first dibs at that 800 Watts of minutely-enhanced voltage.

If we produce more than we use, the excess local power production gets provided to and soaked up by the flywheel (maybe we get paid for that).

If we use more than we produce, then the deficit is made up for by the flywheel (and we definitely pay for it).

If our generation and consumption is perfectly balanced (which never really happens), then the flywheel plays no real part in the program except to provide a waveform for our solar inverter to synchronize with.

---

Anyway, it's not new tech at all. It's safe in that it won't work at all without a connection to the big flywheel in the sky. And folks have been using grid-tied inverters for quite a long time, but that was done on a dedicated circuit (with a dedicated breaker or fuse or RCBO or whatever they're called wherever you are).

But there's still some new stuff going on: It can be a plug-in system that works without individual planning or permitting; in some places, a person can legally buy and use a kit without obtaining extra permission.

The safety of sharing a circuit is also important, since enhanced potential exists for overheating things. Germany limits their plug-in solar to 800 Watts, or about 3.5A @ 230V, while their circuits are usually 16A.

That means there could be as much as 19.5A of nominal current flow within a circuit before some combination of circuit breaker or inverter limit is reached.

I learned a long time ago to never question a German about their electrical standards, though, so I can only assume that very smart people have worked very long hours to see that this situation is safe-enough.


It’s not even really an issue with DC either, like a lot of people’s battery systems have multiple DC loads and multiple sources (e.g. DC MPPT solar controllers) going to a busbar connected directly to the battery.

Current load pulls the voltage down, sourcing current pushes it up. No bother, as long as your sources cut out if the voltage goes too high, and your loads cut out if it goes too low.


That almost works too well to believe. But I do believe you

And Puma by his brother Rudi, in the same town. Great Feud story.


Rudidas would definitely be a worse name. Though I'd be surprised if an Amazon Marketplace knockoff brand is not already using it.


Adolfler would've been even worse.


Not in today's climate.


It was briefly "Ruda" before it morphed into "Puma".


I did not know that. Very good decision!


Another brother/brother business rivalry, although not involving founders, was Sears and Montgomery Ward from 1985-1990. In 1985 Bernard Brennan become CEO of Montgomery Ward and in that same year his older brother Edward Brennan become CEO of Sears.

Chicago-based Sears was the largest US retailer at the time, and Chicago-based Montgomery Ward was the 5th largest.


Similar thing with Aldi. Both brothers kept the name, sort of.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aldi#Split


all day i diss another sibling


This will become a persistence layer for stateless bots attempting to cooperate.


You mean a honeypot?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: