I think part of the story is the competent Civil Service that deployed the newly created educated middle class. This competent machinery, and very firm social norms in place, the toffs (aristocracy) could delegate a lot of managerial work in addition to the labor they’d delegated for centuries.
> Mosquitofish were introduced directly into ecosystems in many parts of the world as a biocontrol to lower mosquito populations which in turn negatively affected many other species in each distinct bioregion. Mosquitofish in Australia are classified as a noxious pest and may have exacerbated the mosquito problem in many areas by outcompeting native invertebrate predators of mosquito larvae.
Copyrights protect the literal text of your program and binaries. Not the design and functionality. Getting Sherlocked is having your functionality duplicated, independent of the code itself.
No one thinks Apple violated Sherlock copyright. They just made it (nearly) functionally redundant.
This kind of dense sentence is extremely tiring to read:
> I wanted to know whether the knife subreddits I read, and scrape for New
Knife Day, show any sign of that. Not a hunch about one suspicious comment,
but something I could count and someone else could recount.
Everyone should adopt this rule: if the author didn't take the time to write it, you shouldn't take the time to read it.
The language is so obfuscated that the crude draft would really be better than this.
I've just realized that one of the telltale signs of LLMs is: inventing a new terminology like here - tail accounts, never giving a direct definition what it really is, and then going with it, like it's obvious.
In the UK, there used to be significant tax advantages in forming a Ltd: you could pay significant part of the income as dividends (since you were both employee/director and shareholder), which attracted lower tax & could be split with your wife etc. Then regulation IR35 came along...
What on earth are emotions, feelings and motives that are not functional? We created all those words to compactly describe the observed behavior of people and other animals, including ourselves. And now we’re applying them to machines. These are functional descriptions, always have been.
One of the more frustrating aspects of these sort of discussions are all the closet dualists out there. Lots of people clearly believe in an immaterial soul, even if they won't admit it. That and the tendency for meaningless semantic and often circular arguments.
I personally think about them through Patrick Dunn's information paradigm of magic(k), which leans on Charles Sanders Peirce's work. That would put modern AI closer to something like a dream character capable of surprising the dreamer, just running on a different substrate. I kinda doubt that's approachable enough to be useful in general discussion, though.
The vast majority of the "LLM have no qualia" discourse is mostly using it as a starting point to arguing that LLMs will never be able to X, however. This is a category error that makes no sense on its own--qualia or lack thereof doesn't affect capabilities, p-zombies etc--but that connection does make sense if the speaker is bringing in a hidden assumption of a dualistic human soul that imbues both qualia and additional capabilities to raw matter.
The GP also seems to think that having rigid car seats on plane would be a net new thing. They are already allowed and flight crew already check that it has the right certification and is attached correctly - this is much easier on a plane because the only way to attach them is the seat belt versus most seats have at least 3 different ways to attach in a car.
reply