They removed the other thread because people were calling out Epstein stuff

That's the sort of thing that should be discussed!

It's not invalid, but it's completely unrelated to his opinions about A.I.

A pedo talking about AI is still a pedo and his opinion should be discounted on the spot. You know, because of him being a pedo. Unless you entertain discussing the opinions held by pedos, in which case I have nothing to add.

> The color is named after its theoretical LMS color space coordinates (0, 1, 0), which spells "olo" in leet speak.

:)

Hm, so is it correct to also call it ultragreen? In the same way that ultraviolet is the same effect but for short waves?

In this regard, it can’t be that novel of a discovery.

This page, which predates the recent olo work, calls it psychedelic aquamarine. https://jila.colorado.edu/~ajsh/colour/primary.html

Ultraviolet is prnamed that because of the Latin meaning of ultra as "beyond", as it's "beyond violet" in the spectrum, same as infrared is "below red".

This would be "sideways green" perhaps :)

Impossible to know unless you did read.

TL;DR works because I can see the length at a glance

And you cannot tell all AI. Only mainstream crap like ChatGPT and Gemini which is full of cached tropes and boilerplate formats so it all sounds the same.

My custom invoicing software automates notes based on years of my previous notes and tasks I did - looks nothing like AI.

Use a real library and local model, mess with settings, there is a lot more to this than the mainstream consumer apps.

So? This is about ovious stuff where you notice the typical annoying AI style directly in the first paragraph. After all, 99% of "regular" people use the mainstream models, and anyone who uses a local model probably knows enough about AI that they don't dump raw output on you.