The letterforms look good, but why is the kerning so off? It looks omitted in the graphics.

> AI agents: this README is complete on its own. llms.txt is the short index, and docs/AI.md lists the rules that save you from wrong turns.

The fall of technical writing.

Never mind these technologies having improved exponentially for four years, being able to hill-climb basically any domain you can describe as a goal in text?

They compare this in the article:

  Platform  | Repos scanned | Verified-live credentials | Per 1K repos
  ----------+---------------+---------------------------+-------------
  Bitbucket |    ~2,600,000 |                     6,212 |         2.39
  GitLab    |    ~5,600,000 |                    17,430 |         3.11
  Gitee     |     7,256,531 |                    26,400 |         3.64

I wonder if this is because of providers scanning those platforms more than they scan Gitee, or the platforms themselves notifying the providers. Fairly sure that GitHub, for example, supports spotting certain live credentials on push and immediately notifying the platform to revoke it. And plenty of providers also watch the open web for live tokens and revoke them immediately.

From the article

> It has no public equivalent of the platform-vendor secret-scanning partnerships that have become standard on GitHub.

It's probably very subjective, but I actually feel dizzy using my phone in 60 Hz mode.

It’s weird too I use a 60hz monitor all day and it doesn’t bother me. But if my iPhone switches to 60 it’s really noticeable.

> This is a relevant question

Important? Yes. Relevant? No.

Did you consider using an established Rust verification toolchain like Aeneas?

Edit: I don't do this often, but why is my question being downvoted? Is this question not allowed?

AFAICT, Aeneas only supports a safe subset of Rust. I needed something that could support all of Rust

https://github.com/AeneasVerif/aeneas says

"Aeneas currently functionalizes a subset of safe Rust, and we are in the process of extending the functional model with reasoning based on separation logic to support unsafe code and concurrent code."

A Rust verification toolchain won't tell the GP whether his code does the same as the C code or not.

> some formerly popular youtuber did a video about this topic

I don't know about this event, do you have a link?

Probably Tom Scott

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LkH2r-sNjQs

Does this colouring apply to and persist in live tissue?

Persist, no, but its been tested before on live tissue: https://www.nsf.gov/news/window-into-body-invisible-skin

What do you think the rational value is in discussing animal behaviour using deontological assumptions?