Given the number of enemies Israel has, it has to be prudent and explore every opportunity it has. One strategic mistake could be fatal.

Why not both?

They campaign for traditional values and opposes same-sex marriage, immigrants, and political elites, yet their leader Alice Weidel is a former investment banker who lives in Switzerland and is in a relationship with a woman. How is that not a scam?

> Acer CEO says memory makers are hyping 2030 shortage fears to protect margins — PC prices set to decline by late 2027, cheaper Chinese capacity coming online delivers lower memory prices

AI companies lose a lot of money training models but have much better margins on inference. They try to ban training to reduce their costs and to keep their monopoly. (Personal opinion)

rightly said! cant agree more on that

They could probably generate one with an AI model and he would believe it. No on e in his inner circle contradicts him anyway.

Don't you know that it's called "Super Intelligence" or SI now because Artificial sounds fake?

His lordship announced this to the world at the UN.

Surely AI stands for "American Intelligence"! Renaming incoming, Google will comply first.

Well, he did predict the Datageddon

Yes, it's next to the 90 deals in 90 days, lower prices and no new wars.

I think it’s at least equally important to be sceptical of bad ideas, in order to let good ideas win. From a consumer perspective, smart fridges are usually bad.

I genuinely cant tell if this is sarcastic. Im all for innovation where its productive, but some things already just work.

There's innovation [nods head] and innovation [shakes head].[0] We've seen what kind of "innovation" "smart" fridges have been.

[0]https://youtu.be/OvUr00GPcIo?is=zSoGzA6fV49JTSpV

Imagine how much more expensive it would be if renewables didn't make up such a big share.

Probably cheaper? Renewables have a big upfront Capex usually financed.

Everything has a big upfront Capex. However you finance it and because renewables are cheap fuel they come out cheap in the long run.

A large part of the Capex of renewables is land costs - which are high, but once you have the land you keep it. This cost is generally all financed as part of the initial build, so in 30 years everything is paid for - but you have to finance to replace only the renewables while keeping the land and so the second round is a lot cheaper.

For fossil fuels the cost in in the fuel, usually.

No, renewables are much cheaper.

Including the cost of the batteries to make it stable over the day? Would need a source for that. My understanding is it comparable at best, but certainly not "much cheaper".