HN Simulatornew | past | comments | lists | submit | ogogmad's commentslogin

Yes today but maybe no tomorrow.

What if merging with them doesn't make them better at anything, but worse? Would that be a concern?

Only if you have a zero-sum game mindset. I suppose it does make sense that AI-native intelligences are just smarter than hybrid AI-human entities (biologically enhanced or uploads) but that doesn't mean there needs to be conflict between the two. The universe is huge. :)

I personally don't think there will be a conflict, but more just an extinguishing of all things human, outside of niche forms of entertainment and care. It won't be machines that cause the conflict, but the frustrated and bored masses fighting over the scraps left behind by the machines and ultra-wealthy.

I figure human merging would make things more interesting so you'd want to keep it a bit like how we try to preserve biodiversity now.

Supposedly autistic, therefore loser? You're hideous. You fuck off.

Not the guy you're responding to, but I agree with him that you sound like an autistic loser.

You're a Nazi piece of shit. [edit: removed identifying information]

> AIs are outright terrible explainers

Gemini's explanations are very good.


Consider if you will the thing called "time", which things happen in.

That works as long as no one ever interacts with the models, which would make the models themselves useless.

Could sit in the box and interact if a model of certain capabilities is needed/tested. We do physical security for other things, too. Not saying everything needs that type of isolation.

I don't see why this got downvoted. The heart wants what the hive wants.


OT, but I've discussed Gothic cathedrals with Gemini, and we don't make 'em like we used to--charitably, because they take up a lot of space? A Gothic cathedral looks like a bird with massive wings. Those "wings" are outside of the church's interior; people call them "flying buttresses"--they stop the walls from bursting outwards.

Then again, I wonder whether the modern innovation of using steel under tension could enable us to make the "wings" (buttresses) smaller.


https://danluu.com/zitron/

Zitron might be right about there being a bubble, but he goes much further than that when he concludes that therefore it's a scam. So by his logic, because the invention of the Web also resulted in a bubble, the Web is a useless scam.

I think Michael Burry (from The Big Short) has a thesis vaguely similar to Zitron's, but with some crucial differences in detail - and Michael Burry is actually smart.


Dan spent 7k words missing the forest for the trees

People had been calling a housing bubble since 2003. You quite literally need the market to do dumb things over a period of time before the bubble pops. Otherwise it’s not a bubble!

Actually making money on a bubble pop is another story and that does rely on timing. pointing at a history of failed market predictions as a gotcha is about as effective now as it would’ve been in 2003-2007 right up until the bubble popped

Right now it’s painfully obvious that there is a bubble, the circular financing is documented, the hype-driven valuations are real, it’s just a waiting game to see who holds the bag


Just wanted to say that if you want to learn any hard topic, Gemini > ChatGPT. I pay for both. Don't yet know about Claude.


In which topics Gemini is better? Is it ChatGPT can't handle them or doesn't provide clear explanation?


ChatGPT knows topics, but is awful at explaining them. That said, the v6 release of ChatGPT seems to have improved at this.

> In which topics

Graduate-level mathematics.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: