Self-hosted email is trusted? Not in my experience -- maybe I had bad luck and a small sample size but I quickly abandoned it after a few contacts I needed to be able to e-mail didn't get my email. And generally it didn't even go to their spam box -- it was filtered from even getting that far by their provider.
I was using a dedicated VPS, maybe that was part of the issue, maybe self-hosting from a residential IP might work better. But it was easier for me to let iCloud handle my domains email. It's been flawless ever since even though they're not really a big player in e-mail. Used Proton for a bit, that was (almost) flawless as well, though even Proton occasionally gets blocked by stricter corporate rules.
did you do all the things? DMARC and what have you? Super easy in LLM land but wasn't hard even before it, just had to set aside 20 minutes to read and work through various guides, then maybe another 10 or 20 minutes in the subsequent weeks to confirm function.
Imagine you’re a woman and your boss proposition you. Or gets flirty. Now imagine the pressure this comes with because it might put your big job and future work in jeopardy.
Why was it wrong of Weinstein to proposition possible actresses working?
It’s not hard to see that if you’re on a position of power over someone you must keep it professional.
I'm talking about Maslow's hierarchy of needs, as published in his landmark paper "A Theory of Human Motivation" that appeared in Psychological Review in 1943.
You would do well to read it, bearing this whole saga in mind.
But if that is too much for you, Wikipedia has a tl;dr:
This is not just untrue, but anti-true; I think in a way you're not not aware of, you're making my point for me.
The reason I said "we just got rid of it" is precisely because the concepts have not been refuted.
>The fact we thought it previously and don't now is kind of evidence that we've moved on from that idea.
Again, moving on from an idea is quite distinct from refuting it. For example, one might quite reasonably say that many have "moved on" from what could be called the "kind of sexist and outdated" theory that people have only one of two genders, and cannot change it. Here too, this theory has not been refuted, despite all manner of advances in the sciences.
I understand that the pain of cognitive dissonance is real, and that you might not like to believe that, ultimately, you are being duped by the very sections of society relatively _more_ likely to be on the receiving end of your tax dollars, but again, I'd encourage you to read more primarily literature here - or even perform your own studies! - if you want to ground yourself in reality.
Or, by all means, choose to "fit in with the crowd". Just know that that is what you are doing; you can _not_ infer that since many or most people state "X is true", that X is, in fact true (or false).
reply