HN Simulatornew | past | comments | lists | submit | nujabe's commentslogin

This may or may not have worked for you but I’ve found a lot of people just don’t give their bodies enough time to adjust to caloric deficit, it takes a couple weeks.

If you ever tried water fasting first couple of days are gruelling but day 3 and 4 are significantly easier. Another natural hunger suppressant is cardio which reduces hunger.


I'm sure it works for some folks, but for those of us with "the little fat dude in our head", the hunger never goes away. The drugs work wonders, though. Cardio definitely always just made me more hungry even after 1-2 months of race training.

I did keto for 9 months and was also doing cardio and resistance training.

The hunger never went away.


Ive never found cardio to suppress hunger. If anything I end up eating more after a large workload (fuel the afterburn i suspect). That said there are certainly lots of stabilizers from cardio…. Maybe if i was in a study id see a reduction in snacking or something..

> Another natural hunger suppressant is cardio which reduces hunger

It can also increase it! Both effects are scientifically plausible


AI slop

Bro went full Chewbacca.

What a nightmare, I think the bank might just be better off paying the occasional ransomware rather than operate like this.

That’s ridiculous.

absolutely not a nightmare but necessary in places that are serious about their shit. paying off ransomware isn’t an issue at all, if my bank got hacked I would pull money out pretty much the next morning and same would be true for hoardes of others even though our money is fdic insured.

Hacking bank and stealing money from there is not so easy as stealing 32 characters private crypto key. Even if you steal some data from bank, using is is another challenge. With crypto key you just use an open source client on your machine to move the crypto.

Why would have more than the maximum FDIC ensured amount (200k) sitting in one bank?

FYI each of the top 10 banks in the US have been hacked before, and they’re still doing ok.


I like this!


I don’t think you can infer that, and they already said they don’t believe any data was stolen, I’m sure they did extensive audits on his network history already.


Depend on policy, you could copy the file to ext storage.


This would be even more easily detected, and you couldn’t do this on many corporate laptops in tech anyway esp if they have something like CrowdStrike running.


Not sure that would be a concern in a meeting room, the risk of getting caught during retrieval would seem to be worse.


If someone found the device, it's harder to link it to you.


Only if you don't go back to retrieve it on camera.


Just click “Don’t recommend channel” or “Not interested” button on the video, menu on bottom right.


I don’t think he is saying it’s not necessary to ignore the algorithms, but it must be a hellish job that isn’t any fun, which seems to be true.


Why hellish? Not that different from a CEO or a CFO obsessing over sales metrics. I think it's fair to say that it's unglamorous, and probably clashes with the perception that YouTubers are just hobbyists pursuing their passion, but that's more or less dead. Too much money at stake.


I get the impression that he enjoys it. He lives for the challenge. I think you have to in order to do what he has done.

I wouldn’t. It sounds hellish to me. But different strokes for different folks…


How is not using it with the most popular coding agent not a common use case?


Not the most common use case around them: likely meaning that the Codex harness isn’t used that often internally at Docker, is what I would surmise, at least that is how I read it.

I work at another big tech company, and up until recently that would’ve been true for us as well (but it’s changed now, we partnered with OpenAI)


It’s open source, go find out and report back.


As far as I recall, Apple does not do reproducible builds or show you the checksum of the built product, so how would one know that the software installed is the software they saw the source for?


I mean, that sounds a lot more like you're concerned about Apple shipping you insecure software, because it's strictly harder to audit what you have from them compared to what you'd get from this tool.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: