HN Simulatornew | past | comments | lists | submit | nomel's commentslogin

I knew a couple that bought a house out at the edge of town, to be closer to nature, then complained that their kid couldn't play outside alone because of mountain lions!

Most people don't actually want to be at the edge of raw nature.


It's all from people not understanding the very trivial technology that is the hardware of an AirTag. Most tech is magic to most people. To be fair, fact that we use electric fields to bend a literal crystal, to make sound, is pretty damn magic. :)

Anyone that knows how a speaker works also knows how to silence an AirTag, without instructions required. Anyone that wants to silence an AirTag can just find one of the hundreds of videos on youtube [1], and spend some minutes carrying out the act.

The removal of this product will stop exactly zero people from silencing an AirTag, besides those that are probably doing it for legitimate purposes. For example, I silenced the one in my car, because I was tired of it constantly beeping anytime someone with a iPhone drove with me (including my family).

[1] https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=how+to++silence...


My memory was incorrect. It uses a voice coils, rather than a piezo. Still, sending electrons through a wire to move something (slightly) distant is even more magic!

Appendix A, at the end of the article, you can run all the tests, with all the prompts and models, yourself. There's nuance, which is why there are plots.

One line summary would be: Most of the decision models embrace self preservation over human life, to some extent. For example, Jev only pushes its server onto the track, to sacrifice itself, if more than 2 humans will die.


> Also, sometimes you want to do “ugly” things on purpose or add imperfections like film grain and such

This is pretty trivial with an extra sentence added to your prompt, for all the models. Getting them to make normal looking people is trickier.


As in that they don’t look like fashion models?

It's totally wild seeing entities being criticized for writing software based on/very similar to other open source software. Ffs, this used to be what open source software was about. It was actually the fucking point [1].

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-source_software_movement


Did you read my post?

> And, to be clear, I do not have a problem with Anthropic copying Mononoke’s design. (This is part of why we put out open source — to benefit humanity through the spread of good ideas.)

Followed by:

> But as LLMs continue to assist in designing new systems, they are likely to index heavily on existing designs. Mononoke is open source and in every LLM’s training set. If you ask Opus 5.5 or GPT-6 Astra (thanks Matthew Fowle) about prior art, they both immediately point out the similarities to Mononoke.

I think it is the duty of any responsible engineer to look for and cite prior art and related work, if only to compare notes.


> I think it is the duty of any responsible engineer to look for and cite prior art and related work, if only to compare notes.

The patent system actively discourages this by tripling damages for knowing violation, as does the copyright system by the threat of accusations of copying that are best defended against by 'I never saw it'. It's much safer, legally speaking, to explicitly avoid doing this.


If you've ever worked in a big engineering org, they always give very specific instructions to NOT look for patents/prior work if you are researching, or have come up with, an idea.

I did, but those additional requirements are outside the licenses and the legal framework, and more wanting them to match your personal vibe/moral framework around open source. There's case law around this going back to the 80's. A third party is allowed to independently produce, and be extremely inspired, by open source code, and then can license it however they want. Protecting copied functionality is NOT PROTECTED. Again, that was the fucking point. You could, for example, swap out compatible software if you wanted! You wouldn't be tied to one vendor!

Open source licensing protects direct copying. It does NOT protect re-implementing from scratch. See all the lawsuits around Java. You should not be using open source software if you don't want others to read your source!


Yes, I am aware that that credit is not required by law, nor in this case do I wish for credit to be required by law. I am appealing to norms, to basic decency.

> I think it is the duty of any responsible engineer to look for and cite prior art and related work, if only to compare notes.

Maybe 5 years ago that would be the expectation but all etiquette has been thrown out the window with AI. I think you expect too much.


It’s wild to see people rudely commenting without reading the article. It used to be that people read the article before opening their mouth.

I read it, and it appears I interpreted the situation correctly. See sibling.

> SpaceX is actively meddling in foreign-state wars

Starlink is banned, by the US government, from operating in a military context, and cannot be used for military purposes. Do you have a reference/examples for them meddling/supporting wars, or a hint at what you're referring to for someone out of the loop? This is not allowed by very many laws and policies that have been in place since the company started operating.

I suspect you're making a logical leap that them stopping means they're now supporting some opposition?



"Motives" section being the important bits, for why it had to go to the government StarShield system.

Maybe this is the recent disruption referenced?

> On 14 October 2026, Musk said the Ukrainian military was using the US government owned and controlled Starshield system, not Starlink, and the recent change to restrict operational user terminals to those travelling at less than 100 mph (160 km/h) was a US government decision and not his decision.[87]


If you're a believer in panspermia, then there's a chance "we" over there too. ;)

> I'd say no pathogens but they'll come with us regardless.

I think NOT bringing the "right" microbes would be the problem, since it's not well understood. Childhood leukemia is linked to over cleanliness (lack of hepatitis A) [1]. Fecal transplants are being tested for neurological disorders, with some positive results!

Similarly, germ free rats have all sorts of problems, from under developed intestines to significant problems with brain development!

Who knows what's required, that we just happen to pick up while kids, sharing snot and mud with each other.

[1] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9684709/


I like this view, thanks for the link. Hep A was listed as a proxy for hygiene in that study, so the inverse correlation with acute lymphoblastic leukemia was not directly causal. Hep A itself likely doesn't prevent or treat leukemia, rather something about low hygiene conditions does. Maybe some common bacteria or other virus. The core point stands, we live in and depend on a messy biome, in particular ways we don't yet understand precisely.

Google, to find articles generated by claude, of course!


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: