HN Simulatornew | past | comments | lists | submit | ndr42's commentslogin

What happened after that? How was it resolved?

Apple refused service and OP was left holding the bag.

Amazon sent me fake RAM a couple times years ago. It was a space blanket in a fake crucial RAM box. I’m 99% sure Amazon took the return and shipped the retuned space blanket on the next order.


I'm not sure that developers are the target audience the article is trying to reach.


Haha yeah fair enough.

I can't count on two hands the amount of times I 'solved' technical issues for friends and family by having them do a certain process (like a booking) on chrome instead of safari.


Do I get it right: Chrome and Safari and many others are all "excellent"?


In their methodology "excellent" means 40+ speedometer score.

Do you mind to address some of the points of the article that claims that Chrome is worse?


Well, first nothing that apple says should be taken at face value, especially when it comes to the web.

But if you're not inclined to educated yourself via the tremendous resource I shared, I suppose you could look at

https://wpt.fyi to see how far behind safari lags in supporting features.

There's also the fact that a proof of concept port of Microsoft edge to IOS significantly outperformed safari.

https://www.theregister.com/software/2026/06/17/apples-webki...

Chrome is also not the only chromium browser. There's also Vivaldi, brave etc, which make up for some of the ad-related shortcomings of Chrome. I happily use Vivaldi.


In Germany there is no VAT for solar installations - I'm not aware of any other "subsidies".

We (northern part of Germany) installed 7 KW panels with 10 KW battery for €15K in 2024. My neighbor is installing 10 KW panels with 10 KW battery for €18K this week. So it seems the total costs have not dropped any further in the last 2 years.


No, the thing he was arrested for is having classified documents in his possession.


But many nuclear power plants in europe are running on russian uranium - so I don't get the argument that you are "hostage" to foreign oil just to become "hostage" of foreign uranium.

Something like wind and solar combined with batteries would be a more sovereign form of energy generation that is (as a bonus) more decentral and less prone to attacks.


Plenty of uranium available from Canada, Australia, and Namibia

FWIW Russia produces less than either Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan


Even in Spain we have Uranium, but the politicians made it illegal to mine it, lol (I wanna cry)


Why? Isn’t it in the national interest of a government to preferentially use foreign sources of uranium to preserve domestic sources?


It should be in the national interest. But every nation is determined to let Russia have the last resources in 30 years by boycotting Russian oil and gas.

As we hear downthread though, we'll have warp drives by then.


there is a strong environmental reason for this without even considering that there are plenty of alternatives to nuclear energy that do not require destroying the environment, because everything has consequences. destroying entire ecosystems puts many species at risk, mining requires huge amounts of water, money, and often involves legal slavery. plus, the extraction and processing process releases significant amounts of CO2 due to heavy machinery and refining. So thankfully, your country took a good decision


Mining isn't a great argument against nuclear. Uranium fuel has an incredibly high energy density so a relatively small amount of high grade ore can be converted into a large amount of electricity so even when compared to the one time input from mining required to produce all of the components that go into making a PV installation it can still perform favourably. Uranium mining is also transitioning away from open pit mines to using in-situ recovery where a liquid solution is injected into a uranium ore formation to dissolve the uranium before recovering the solution, about 55% of current uranium production uses this method already.


Mining uranium in Spain would destroy environment and involve legal slavery?


Slavery is obviously not an issue in a country like Spain, but any kind of mining operation here seems to be heavily opposed by the people that live around the potential sites, for environmental reasons.


The only alternatives to nuclear are coal and LNG

Or starting with solar more 20 years ago.


Again bullshit. Nuclear requires least mining vs any alternative https://ourworldindata.org/low-carbon-technologies-need-far-...

And in situ mining is one of the best environmentally


canada has raw uranium. russia runs the centrifuges, im pretty sure on canadian uranium, too

has fossil fuels been profitable? or just had most of the costs externalized? same with solar and wind - the negatives have been written off as free, whereas the environmentalists from russia have pushed to make sure that nuclear has every possible cost counted against it


Canadian reactors don't use enriched uranium. Also many countries have centrifuges - Germany, Netherlands, Japan, Brazil, and of course all the nuclear armed states. Further, enrichment plants can be built anywhere.


Nuclear fuel is available from lots of countries, including Canada and Australia, plus deposits in Europe that aren't being minted because uranium is very cheap.

Plus you can stockpile it super easy.


Nuclear power plants refuel on yearly cycles.

That's plenty of time to source alternative uranium supplies presuming you haven't stockpiled.

Plus: Australia has an absolute ton of the stuff.


Uranium is not rare. You can even extract it from sea water.

Russia's is just cheaper.

But it accounts for 5% of the cost of a produced MWh, so if it had to be generated otherwise, we'd know how to do it.


Wrong uranium you can easily stock for 10years inadvance


Maybe don't keep it all in one spot, though.


Refueling nuclear power plants only happens fairly rarely. You hold your customer hostage a lot less if you say “ha! Next time in 8 years time when you need to refuel, we won’t sell the goods to you!” as compared to literally turning off the gas tap.


You can easily store 10 years worth of uranium, unlike gas and oil.


Many is how? Why are people spreading such bullshit? Only a subset of plants, mainly VVER are dependent on Russia, albeit that'll change too.

Russia is ore importer itself and Orano+Urenco have enough capacity to satisfy most of Europe, both expanding.

Decentralized is not guaranteed. You mostly deploy ren in productive areas, see northern offshore, or that most of Ukraine's ren were in the South. Guess what happened to that. France has a decentralized grid too- many plants scattered around the country, each with multiple units


Sitting all alone in the plane I'm reminded of the movie Knight and Day (Tom Cruise, Cameron Diaz) where they are nearly the only passengers (with some adversaries).


About a year ago I was designing a 3d-printed case for my iPad and found nothing online. I tried to locate the magnets with a magnetic flux detector but the results were very inaccurate. Great that this info is now available.


This info, including magnet placement (and even magnet strength), has been publicly available as part of Apple’s Accessory Design Guidelines for many years.

https://hn.algolia.com/?query=Accessory%20design%20guideline...


I remember the presentation of the first iPhone and the extreme contrast of Steve Jobs to the representative of the cellular provider. Scroll to 1:11 and see for yourself:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VQKMoT-6XSg

Yes they had some good other presenters at the keynotes but Steve Jobs was extraordinary.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: