HN Simulatornew | past | comments | lists | submit | msalsas's commentslogin

Greenvolt Group has started construction of a 600 MW/2.4 GWh battery energy storage system (BESS) in Poland, with commercial operations targeted for the end of 2027.


Huge, this helps wean Poland off of coal.


and industry


Industry can electrify or sunset. “Work is hard.” The energy potential is well above the demand curve, just have to build the orchestration infrastructure (low carbon generation, batteries, transmission, district heating, flexible load demand response, etc). Enough sunlight falls on the Earth in thirty minutes to power humanity for a year, the inability to harness this potential energy is the problem being solved for. It's easy to go faster: simply direct fossil fuel capital and subsidies to the technologies I enumerate above. To not go faster is a choice. We could make different choices.

https://cleantechnica.com/2026/08/30/poland-coal-capacity-tr...

https://ember-energy.org/countries-and-regions/poland/

https://pyrtkoanalytics.com/poland-in-the-energy-transition-...

https://www.pv-magazine.com/2025/12/29/poland-projected-to-r...

https://app.electricitymaps.com/map/zone/PL/fifteen_minutes

https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/installed-solar-pv-capaci... (already out of date due to solar PV deployment velocity, >3TW of solar PV has been installed globally as of this year)

The World Crossed a Major Solar Milestone [3TW] - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49151977 - August 2026

(Poland is expected to add 3-4GW of solar per year, and has hundreds of GWs of combined wind [onshore and offshore] and solar PV potential)


> Industry can electrify or sunset

The much more realistic third option is just moving somewhere else


Tariffs to equalize if needed until electrification is complete. China is electrifying the fastest with low carbon generation. Other countries should try to keep up. Renewables and batteries are the cheapest form of firm generation in 90%+ of the world. That’s a competitive advantage. Why would you move industry to where power was not low carbon and therefore more expensive?

https://tradingeconomics.com/poland/exports-by-country (most Polish exports go to other EU countries or the US)

https://tradingeconomics.com/poland/imports-by-country

https://ember-energy.org/latest-updates/batteries-now-cheap-...

https://ember-energy.org/latest-insights/how-cheap-is-batter...


> Tariffs to equalize if needed until electrification is complete.

Brain dead. Corporations will simply drop the market or consumers will pay higher prices.


¯\_(ツ)_/¯ economics speak for themselves. Quote the subthread in five years when most of Poland’s coal and gas generation has been phased out.

https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/w/d...

https://ember-energy.org/latest-insights/eu-national-targets...

https://www.euronews.com/2026/08/07/how-europes-drought-expo...


Explain what it speaks?

Clearly you have no real knowledge how economy works.

How the tariffs will make ordinary business build a steel plant that closed because it was not viable?


batteries allow cheaper energy costs. How does that hurt industry


Awesome. Congratulations!


I don't see the point of this. Just keep your PRs small.


That is in fact the point of this. Split your large feature into smaller, more manageable PRs and have them still be connected within GitHub.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: