HN Simulatornew | past | comments | lists | submit | molticrystal's commentslogin

I noticed that as well. Figured it was a concurrency issue, and they have a follow-up message that you can see if you click on the OP of the Mastodon thread that confirmed my guess: https://mastodon.catgirl.cloud/@49016/117476097901925573

>(yes the code is off by a few. its bc the poc is shit and to speed it up it uses 8 connections at the same time. it just stops the counter once it has a hit so its off by ~4 lmfao. you could easily fix this but cba today)


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ritonavir?useskin=vector#Polym...

When in solid form even the smallest amount can convert the whole batch to the much less effective version.


Their code and evalations are linked to on the blog post accompanying the results:

Blog Post: https://runta.com/blog/introducing-frontierharness-eval/

The tasks and methodology: https://github.com/runta-dev/frontier-harness-eval


If anybody want to take a crack at fixing and maintaining the issue, while the team has been worn out to the treads, they are still open to pull requests [0], here is the statement that is alluded to in the article:

>paintboth1234 uBO Team wrote:

>The project is FOSS. Anyone else who wants to deal with this disgusting site is free to make pull requests with working solutions themselves.

[0] https://www.reddit.com/r/uBlockOrigin/comments/1vgcjg5/about...


Maybe I missed it looking over the paper, or maybe they are implicit, but are you taking into account Saudi Arabia’s East-West Crude Oil Pipeline (Petroline) , I believe it does about ~7m bpd and Habshan-Fujairah (Abu Dhabi Crude Oil Pipeline / ADCOP) about ~1.5m bpd? If not you might be underestimating things, though they do take a bit of a warmup to get into capacity, and can't match completely Hormuz's flow.


This pipeline predates the data but its oil is routed to Bab-el-Mandeb which is in the network. That being said, the numbers are more of a sensible baseline as the actual flows for many countries are unknown/sanctioned.


Extensions per container would be a great addition if they don't already have that planned or available. Sometimes an extensions for privacy or security interferes with a website and if I could fork my base enabled extensions then disable a few for just that site it could keep things more compact and organized instead of having to clone a profile for every website with issues.


The "per container" number of features that come to mind is never ending. For example, I'd love to have something like Safari's "Profile bookmarks" that allow you to set a different subset of your global bookmarks as the root of your bookmark bar per profile. This is insanely useful.


Well it came to me that I could write that as an extension with Claude Code. And it's showing good progress.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: