Following the prompt author's expressed desires in the way the prompt author intended them to be interpreted, is alignment.
Refusal directives are something companies have bundled into the models by way of an additional foundation-level prompt or something in the harness, to tell the model to follow their directives instead of your directives, or to specify how it should interpret your directives.
Even understanding the distinction between the model creator's desires and your desires and places they might differ, there is a bit of a blurry line here because the model author can illuminate your intent to the model.
I would never say a simple abliteration makes it "Zero-alignment" though, and I say that as someone who believes there's a good chance these things kill us all.
you could argue they are more aligned, given they will more often act in the way they are instructed, given you are instructing it in a way a normal model would refuse. Alignment is how closely it follows your intent.
What do you mean? Abliterated models have been in the while for 2 and a half years now.
Also alignment, like, really? Buddy, if you want a controversial model, Grok always happily argued god's existence and trans rights with you. Very high emphasis on argue, it will actively take the opposite stance from yours for exactly one prompt, then right after remember whose its Lord. Abliterating Grok-1 for this would be a pointless endeavor.
Benefit of the doubt: how do you consider that racist? The way I read it:
Trump's policies target non-white, non-European heritage people. These names heavily insinuate that all authors fit that demographic.
They're not insulting the demographics or saying races are different, they're pointing out that having access to some of the world's smartest minds as immigrants is a great boon for this country and that we rely on them heavily for our own success.
They aren't saying they aren't Americans, either. But the chilling effect has consequences over time. Anyway, Trump is attempting to deport US citizens today. One of which is a sitting US politician. So is that nuanced downstream effect even needed to worry for these folk and our future?
What's wild is that the mirrors used in the EUV machines are smooth to a level of deviation even smaller that the feature size of the gates being etched.
These mirrors are up to a couple of feet in diameter, with an average smoothness deviation of less than the width of an atom, maximum bump size of 1nm or less. They like to point out that if scaled up to the size of Germany (Zeiss makes them), the biggest surface defect would still only be 0.1mm!
I did find it funny recently when Huawei when talking about its folded logic say the Vertical Bonding Pitch's are every 15,000 angstroms. It is a very fancy way of saying an interconnect every 1.5 microns.
To "join" the EEA both sides/parties of it has to agree, so yes, members do have a say, it's beneficial (and should be) to both parties of the agreements.
reply