Personal numbers are not available from hitta.se.

Not in full as it doesn't have the last 4 partly random digits, though personal numbers aren't that useful even if it was the full one.

If you login with an account (which you can create for free), you can also see the personnumber. See someone elses salary without them knowing about it for 39/49SEK, which is around 3-4$

Not on hitta.se though. Other websites like ratsit have this, but you can also call skatteverket for free.

I'd be interested too.

> AI compresses implementation time for an individual engineer, but architecture decisions, design reviews, integration, testing, deployment, and production validation remain largely serial activities.

Integration, testing, deployment and production validation activities are also, depending on you setup, available for AI to work on. It depends on the type of stack that you have and how your hosting is set up but with an AI-friendly set up there's a lot of time to be saved here too.

This is largely true to only the extent that you you have a machine-verifiable measure of quality. If not, you’re putting more pressure on the humans who can actually reason and understand business goals. This cascades: tests are what make LLM code generation work but if you have an LLM write the tests you are then pushing further down the road the point where you learn that the first LLM was going in the wrong direction.

GP: > With the current capabilities, models still need constant babysitting and course correction.

You'd be opening yourself up to even more babysitting. Would that really save time, or improve quality? I'm not convinced, to put it mildly.

well, that is a problem with automation in general i think; if you go too far instead of a simple process a complicated processes get encoded in the automation and if it hits an edge case or breaks for whatever reason the babysitting kills productivity (this is just my experience anyways)

also, as far as quality goes, once something is automated that potential breakage puts a cap on how much improvement/quality you can achieve later... i'd guess llms are a bit more malleable there, but idk, i still see this issue even with skills and such...

> ...while owning an undisclosed trampoline...

This is the weirdest combination of words I have seen this week. If I own a trampoline, why would my insurance company care? And if they care, why doesn't the market fix this, parents with trampolines would certainly choose other companies.

They care because trampolines have a very high rate of injury. If you throw a birthday party at your house and one of your neighbors kids breaks their arm or worse, neighbor might decide to sue you. That then puts your insurance company on the hook. Even if your policy forbids trampolines you can often plausibly argue you weren't aware, and they end up having to pay out. Insurance companies refuse to cover things all the time and trampolines are apparently a big problem for them (just talked to our insurance broker a few weeks ago about this as my family is pushing to get one and I'm having to push back.)