If margins are already at the least possible bottom (according to market logic this should always happen with commodities and competition) then you need to start to look for ways to reduce your operating costs in order to increase them again
Why? If you are already at an optimum (which "least possible bottom" indicates), then any kind of you trying to move into a different state, is going to leave the optimum.
Exactly this, I wonder why this setup (with ability for external techies to be granted temporary access) was not chosen in the first place. Considering the threat model, "my freezers all defrost at the same time all over my stores because of ~cyber~" should be a critical item to be discussed
Because the incentives are not aligned. In a capitalist society societal consciousness is necessarily imprinted with capitalist (value extracting) logic.
If most of the people around you believe that making money is the logical way to survive then making money will become the goal of many to most human interactions. People will choose big publishers because big publishers guarantee them some amount of money (and services around publishing) in exchange for the ownership and monetisation rights (and then the right to sue somebody into oblivion when they break copyright law).
So the rich and vibrant ecosystem can be reality, just not within current society.
It makes sense in that someone has rightfully pointed out there’s a prison and the door might be opening soon, allowing us to leave and the response was essentially “well, it’s safe here, who else could we reasonably trust?”
How is that unlike developing an attachment to/sympathy for your captors?
Corporate having interests that are not aligned with the interests of the majority and using their funds and power to influence the outcome to their liking is not a new concept
this page is extremely stuttery on my developer machine in chrome. why does every web page now have to have an amount of "fanciness" that apparently not even decently specced machines can take?
reply