Not sure if this is connected, but I've found Gemini pretty hopeless within its own notebooks. I've been doing some job applications, and added cv and docs into a notebook. I then create a new chat to say "here is a job description, help me write a cover letter" or some such.
After about 3 messages in any given chat, a follow-up to "rewrite that with a more friendly tone" will result in a letter for a completely different job from another chat within the notebook.
No they don't. The two Huawei models mentioned are completely different form factors, that are much more open-ear and further from squishy silicone than any Airpods.
This is exactly the assumption that the carefully worded juice hopes you'll make. That Apple's claim to innovation precludes even a cursory glance at the competition
That's a narrow take. Non-deterministic doesn't mean random; workflows can be reasonably validated and consistent to some known degree.
I work for an education department that serves a chatbot for students, and model changes go through painstaking content safety reviews. I initially assumed it's just a bunch of bureaucratic paranoia. But every other model upgrade has a measurably different adherence to the existing system prompts about not talking to the kids about sex and drugs and mental health issues.
I work in the same field for one of my company, in europe, and if you're not self hosting sorry but your worries are not something I can accept because models are very much not reliable on that front, let alone when you let the host decide HOW to serve a model (ressources allocated, different version of the same model, etc ...).
I'm not being a d**, just saying, the problem you have is something that I have faced EXACTLY, and at least here it's not working until you host in house or remote but on raw hardware. Otherwise it keeps having subtle changes, and you will notice no LLM API providers has guarantees about these.
It's not that you're a d*, it's just that you lack any kind of nuance
There's a whole spectrum between self-hosting open weight models and having a cloud provider swap models from under you
Should you self host a model if want to maximize predictability to the limit? Yes. Does that mean it's wrong for someone hitting a model on API to expect that it won't switch to a completely different model under the hood from one day to another? Probably not.
Sure, but if you're working in a field where that limitation is not "because you like it" but "because you have to" it doesn't matter. If you cannot assume it to be true, then you have to assume it isn't.
A couple of years in Tokyo gave me great trust in certain weather apps for eerily precise minute-by-minute rainfall predictions. After a few years back in Sydney, my trust in them has dropped back down to the usual uncertain baseline, and my reliance on them has been mostly replaced with my own rough assessment of the air and sky.
On recent visits to Tokyo, with my current habits, the general crowd (who presumably check some app) has been the more reliable forecast. Either everyone has an umbrella in their hand or they don't. And I discover whether I should have brought my umbrella or if I'll be lugging it around pointlessly, just far enough from my hotel to be stuck with my choice
I wasn't aware of this game until AFTER I saw the movie. Made a lot more sense after that. Watching a guy solve the same puzzle over and over felt like an odd narrative choice.
A labyrinthine Shinjuku would still be way cooler. Shibuya station doesn't have quite the same disorienting featureless repetition to it, but offers a more overwhelming MC Escher-like experience where you can often SEE exactly where you want to go in the near-distance, but every path and every turn brings you into a completely different space, and rarely any closer to your destination.
> offers a more overwhelming MC Escher-like experience
That reminds me of one of my favourite games of all time, Knossu [1]. It's a short game from the peak of the indie era, written by Jonathan Whiting (whose post "Why I write games in C" made the rounds a few times here [2]). It's not anything like a train station, but it's non-Euclidean, labyrinthine, and surreal. My favourite part is that despite it being extremely simple (WASD only), and despite having beat it, I still don't really understand the core mechanic. It feels like a dream.
Actually, hell, that reminder reminds me of another similar looking game, LSD: Dream Emulator [3]. One of the many surreal Platstation 1 & 2 "games" from Japan. I haven't played it, but I've been thinking about it lately as it's the cover art for Alt-J's album Relaxer [4].
After about 3 messages in any given chat, a follow-up to "rewrite that with a more friendly tone" will result in a letter for a completely different job from another chat within the notebook.