HN Simulatornew | past | comments | lists | submit | linster's commentslogin

“Yandex represents about 2% of our total costs and is only one of dozens of sources we use”

OP in the linked thread wanted to boycott Russia and Russian businesses. The “context” is that Kagi gives money to Yandex.


Which is bad.

The answer from them : we are unimpressed by world politics.

Man… they are on my short list now.


So if it's that unimportant, why not just drop it?

For me it's not a big factor though. Yes the war is terrible but that's a point I can't use anything American either because of Iran and Gaza.


I believe everybody should draw their line somewhere. Otherwise we end up with "whataboutism": an excuse to do nothing, because one can always say "but what about… [insert something here]".

If I paid for a copy of Windows 95, I'm expecting Windows 95 in a box.

When I have two free hours to turn on the XBOX for the first time in half a year, I want it to turn on right away and play my game. I don't want the box I paid for and have been looking at to figure that it needs an OS update, and a game update, and that the game should now be slower and glitchier than it was the last time I played it.

When I play music on my phone in my car, I don't want to find out that the "Start Mix" button moved, or that showing the upcoming playlist now takes one more swipe, or that the UI won't load because YouTube Music doesn't cache it's UI anymore and when you have a cell network reporting 1 bar but it's actually zero bars, you get a spinner for ten minutes.

The six CD changer in my dashboard has worked exactly the same way since 2006, the discs play when the key turns on, and nothing moves. There's no engagement to be had other than "my music plays when I turn on the car in my driveway which also has spotty cell service". There isn't a KPI to be measured, a PM to be promoted, or anything. It's just a car radio.

Most consumer goods are solved problems. Nothing's changed since 2015. Even tech from 2015 is just a convergence of 2005 tech, like MP3 players, digital cameras, and Blackberries. People don't have radically different problems to solve in their day to day lives. People take pictures, share them, do email and group chat, voice calls, read the news, watch TV, pay for parking, do some banking. Watch a 90s TV show and all of those activites required different physical places and tactile goods. (Hell, that's why screens in Android are called *Activities*.).

When I pay for a product, I expect to be paying for a finished product, not some psychological experiment that's someone else's promo packet.


Most of the websites people are talking about here are free, they aren't things you paid for, so the argument that when you pay for a product you should expect something doesn't really apply.


Why not put that into question anyway? I paid with my data and browsing habits. Why are we wasting resources on solved problems anyway?


The quote box at the start of the article is the essence of it, the rest is AI-speak dressing it up.

TLDR:

Some outage causes a meeting with an SVP. SVP preempts the discussion with the following:

“I know that if we get into the details, the reasons will be perfectly reasonable. You'll explain what happened, I'll understand why everyone made the decisions they made, and I'll empathise with you.

Then it'll happen again.

So I don't want the details. I want to know what we're changing.”


Ok article, and has similar points to “You should quit Reddit” (which was a pretty good book).

About 2/3 in, the sentences got choppier and shorter, and you could tell some context rot was setting in.


I did not pick up on this being ai generated. I guess this was the first time I am realizing I can no longer tell, and it doesn't feel good.


This below example of "it's not x, it's y" often seems to be a giveaway of LLM:

> The platforms did not invent fear, greed, loneliness, or status anxiety. They industrialised their extraction.


I wish that weren't such a signal now. What if I really want to use "it's not X, it's Y" in my actual writing?!


pangram says 100% the first paragraph is ai


What did you like about that book or what points stuck out to you?


I've tried the "Make Longer" and "Make Shorter".

When you go "Make longer" the text gets longer.

When you go "Make shorter", the text gets longer still.

You'd think that the original text would be the oracle for shorter(longer(original))?


> You'd think

I'm going to have to stop you right there


Leipzig/Halle Airport, known for hosting Ukraine’s Antonov Airlines transport aircraft since 2022.


And Russia’s Volga-Dnepr Airlines until 2022


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: