pangram reports the text as 100% AI generated. I was about to analyze the short story and think about the intentions of the author, it's social commentary. And you have wasted my time...
This needs to stop. No I'm not talking about the AI. I'm talking about the insanity that is presenting me this text and putting your name on it, exploiting my trust.
There is no way to tell if something is AI-generated or not. These classifiers produce a lot of false positives.
I read the story and enjoyed it, even if I don't agree with the social commentary.
> I was about to analyze the short story and think about the intentions of the author, it's social commentary.
I mean, I doubt that the author just said "write me a short story" and that's it. So, there are still some intentions behind the text that the author put into the prompt.
Although, I agree that I'd rather read the prompt [0].
I challenge the author to post their prompts and unless they one-shotted this (which seems unlikely), then I can basically guarantee you that you would not rather read the prompts. In particular because 'the prompts' are a back-and-forth with the chatbot and if you think you don't like reading an AI-assisted short story, you really don't like reading a chat transcript (for one thing, it'll be at least 10x as long and with a lot more and worse chatbot output that the human will try to clean up).
When ChatGPT was still a new thing, I exported all of my conversations to a Markdown dir to try and reflect on what I spent a few months using it for. The AI responses were just walls of useless text, skimmed for a single most trivial point to prompt the next question, and re-reading them without the usual dopamine high felt even more grating. I found most success just writing a sed pipeline to remove all chatbot responses and only read my replies, grepping the original for missing context.
In the context of discerning the author's social commentary intentions, both the initial prompt and the entire conversation they have correcting things would indeed be more valuable than just the output text.
> 'the prompts' are a back-and-forth with the chatbot
I think, reading just the human inputs would be enough to get what they were trying to do.
> it'll be at least 10x as long
I think that even human inputs + short summary of the first draft + short summary of the changes made for each subsequent iteration will be significantly shorter than the whole thing.
I played it and it was fun, I absolutely felt suspense and performance was very good considering it's a web game. Music was fitting but still quite bland. The atmosphere looks good, but was obviously designed to show off advanced graphics...
I like how there were hiding spots and how the bullets of the enemies can reflect off the terrain, allowing you to find hideouts and gain height leverage to take out ground enemies. it's hard to determine the height of drones but could be intentional. I also like how the game certainly isn't too easy. Unfortunately the keybinds aren't rebindable, which is a shame because that means I can't use the visor on a touchpad. Also the undersides of some of the stacked shipping containers aren't properly rendered. Drones clip through some the containers in the distance, probably because they aren't there and part of the skybox, and drones interact weird when colliding with containers quickly jumping up and down to compensate.
7/10 please never generate something like this again.
No, it is noteworthy. Even within Europe and decades ago, when I trained in a field where much important literature was in other European languages like German or French, most undergraduate students were no longer interested in learning those and wanted everything to be provided in English (or the local language). Major academic publishers had already been comissioning, to guide students through the history of the field, volumes of classic nineteenth-century and early twentieth-century papers that had been translated from the original German etc. into English.
This needs to stop. No I'm not talking about the AI. I'm talking about the insanity that is presenting me this text and putting your name on it, exploiting my trust.
reply