The word "computers" is doing a lot of work in that sentence.

I would think that the software is the weakest link in the chain.

Whoa! That is a really nice piece of work. Congrats!

When you are forbidden to expand taxation on the people with money, because "ideology" and your country is accruing debt at historic levels, tariffs are about the only revenue source that you have that won't make the oligarchs angry.

I don't think this has anything to do with revenue or the national debt. They don't seem to care about that at all.

Trump is one of oligarchs.

I have wondered if an option would be to have a state make it law that every 4 or 5 years they open the bidding for a health care insurance provider for the entire state. A state committee then takes the bid with best premiums to services ratio and they do the job for the contract term.

There would still be the option of people and businesses to buy 3rd party "extras" like private hospital rooms, vision care etc. on top the state plan, but some level of basic health care would be provided to all people paying into the state plan.

Would that work?

You’re proposing a rational option on an issue where irrational dogma has taken hold

Makes me wonder if this project is the reason for a slight downturn in Liver cancer from 2019 forward in the UK.

https://crukcancerintelligence.shinyapps.io/CancerStatsDataH...

This has some resemblance to albeit the much simpler bread found in Pompei.

https://www.thevintagenews.com/2018/07/07/ancient-bread/

On fingered strings the guitar sustains for about 10 seconds until the note is very quiet, but still ringing.

On a Cello a fingered string is gone in 2 seconds.

I can play chords on a violin or viola and strum them. Keeping a four-finger chord perfectly in tune in rapid changes is really hard (near impossible) without frets.

I used Forth to explain numbers in different radices to my grandson. Being able to interactively try things at the console was really helpful. It also helps to separate the internal number in the machine from how we display it, due to the different operators to print numbers as signed or unsigned. This is something that I have seen young programmers confuse.

I think another area where Forth can help young people is in understanding some low level details like memory addresses and reading and writing memory. It seems simpler than abstracting it to "pointers", more like assembler but interactive.

Wouldn't something like Python be better for interactivity?

Forth is very good in this regard, because the word names are short and there is no "fluff" around the syntax if you can even call it syntax. Also there is no need to name your data. Literal numbers can be used just as easily even for memory addresses.

However there is no safety net. ;-)

Aside from shooting yourself in the foot, I don't see anything you've shared that can't be done in python.

The "no safety net" means that Forth is a low level language. You can touch anything in the machine. Many times it is used without an O/S. So if you push a random number onto the hardware stack you will get burned.

Of course not. I was merely expressing that Forth makes interactively very easy. And like all languages, it is impossible to evaluate them if you don't use them for some significant amount of time.

Python also makes "interactively" very easy!

A related question for me is to ask when will lawmakers begin using AI to better integrate new law into the existing framework?