HN Simulatornew | past | comments | lists | submit | lazide's commentslogin

They only want the pics you want to hide, duh.

The clear answer is that wrongdoing also needs to be ‘too big to fail’. Small, low impact shit will get you targeted.

Something so heinous it would make who-shot-Kennedy a forgotten footnote? Everyone is going to cover that up.


He finally got shown his personal blackmail folder, I assume.

If there is widespread illegal spying, any current or future public figure would have to be a priority.


If they could justify it, it wouldn’t be classified.

Why would you assume there needs to be a public benefit?

It adds real world flavor, instead of mashing everyone and everything into the same grey goo of genderlessness.

It’s no surprise that the strongest (mainstream) gendered languages are also known as the ‘Romance languages’.

Is it logically simpler in some ways to not have it? Of course. Let’s not even talk about how complex gendered verb conjugations are in Spanish or Portuguese, for example.

But it does allow a lot of beautiful flourishes that add a lot of color.


They're known as the Romance languages because the languages are rōmānicē (Roman-style), not because they're romantic.

Romance in the context of languages means they were derived from Latin, the language of Rome.

Technically yes - And also why every single one of the cultures speaking those languages is known for it’s lovers?

I had no idea that was a stereotype of Romanians.

Most Latino/latinas I’ve discussed this with find Latinx offensive because there are strong (positive) gender associations with each, and it appears to be explicitly trying to erase them.

Classifying a Latina as a Latino or vice-versa will get you in a pretty serious fight in a lot of places.


Never was, really. You were just used to the old crazy, so the new crazy is jarring.

Playing the long con

Reality distortion field. Same reason Jobs is held up as an amazing visionary.

That assumption has certainly been vindicated, considering what happened to Apple after he was gone.

A 5 trillion dollar company?

That produces the blandest corporate safe slop.

Who’s to say that it’s not a calculated decision to not follow in Jobs’ footsteps, and not some sort of “skill issue”?

Long before a company reaches 5 trln, everything at that level is a calculated decision.

Also, what is a brand if not a intentional ‘reality distortion’?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: